Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite McClennen v. McClennen, 464 P.2d 982.
- Berry v. McLeod 604 P.2d 610 Ariz. 1979
-
Berry v. McLeod
604 P.2d 610
Ariz. 1979
Board of Trustees Eloy Elementary School District v. McEwen, 6 Ariz.App.
- Anderson v. Anderson 590 P.2d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- Anderson v. Anderson 590 P.2d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- In Re the Marriage of Goldstein 583 P.2d 1343 Ariz. 1978
-
In Re the Marriage of Goldstein
583 P.2d 1343
Ariz. 1978
appellant contends that the court initially erred by including the accounts receivable in its equitable division of property.
- M. J. W. Theatrical Enterprises, Inc. v. Killeen 580 P.2d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- M. J. W. Theatrical Enterprises, Inc. v. Killeen 580 P.2d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- Czarnecki v. Czarnecki 600 P.2d 1110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
-
Czarnecki v. Czarnecki
600 P.2d 1110
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
to justify the award to him of all the community interest in the retirement pay.
- Neely v. Neely 563 P.2d 302 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
- Neely v. Neely 563 P.2d 302 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
- Safley v. Bates 548 P.2d 31 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- Safley v. Bates 548 P.2d 31 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- Chambers v. Taber 518 P.2d 1008 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
- Chambers v. Taber 518 P.2d 1008 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
- Kamrath v. Kamrath 498 P.2d 468 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
- Kamrath v. Kamrath 498 P.2d 468 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
- Witherspoon v. Witherspoon 498 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
- Witherspoon v. Witherspoon 498 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
- Becchelli v. Becchelli 497 P.2d 396 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- Becchelli v. Becchelli 497 P.2d 396 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- Spector v. Spector 496 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
-
Spector v. Spector
496 P.2d 864
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
” The statute does not mandate a distribution of only net assets but rather vests the widest discretion in the trial court to distribute the property as it deems “just and right.” , : “But, not only should the court take into consideration the value of the community property, it should also take into consideration the total amount of the community liabilities in deciding the division of the property.” We agree that normally the trial judge must consider the communit
- Needel v. Needel 489 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
- Needel v. Needel 489 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971