Live · Arizona

Arizona

Free, searchable Arizona case law — no account, no paywall.

Opinions of the Arizona Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, 1866–present. A public-records project.

  • Free & open Every opinion, free to read and search. No account, no paywall, no charge per search.
  • Private by design We never store your searches — there is no research history to subpoena, sell, or leak.
  • The court's own words Holdings and quotes come straight from the opinion, verbatim. We never paraphrase or generate legal text.
  • 37812 opinions indexed
  • 173 judges (35 currently seated)
  • 1866–2026 date range
  • 16 legal topics to browse

Most recent activity

All opinions →
Docket Court Filed Disposition Case
1 CA-JV 26-0047 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026-08-13 Affirmed In Re Term of Parental Rights as to L.S.
1 CA-SA 26-0132 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026-08-13 Denied in part Northern Arizona v. Bickham
1 CA-CV 25-0982 FC Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026-08-13 Affirmed in part; vacated in part and remanded Rose v. Estrada
1 CA-CV 25-1040 FC Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026-08-13 Affirmed in part; dismissed in part Habicht v. Peterson
1 CA-CR 25-0138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026-08-13 Affirmed State v. Zamora

What you can do here

  • Search by keyword or by concept. Full-text search across every opinion, plus semantic search that finds cases by idea, not just matching words.
  • Jump straight to a citation. Paste a reporter or docket citation and go directly to the opinion.
  • See how a case has been treated. For any opinion, see which later cases cite it — and whether they followed, distinguished, or overruled it.
  • Read the holding in the court's own words. The operative holding, quoted verbatim and linked to the paragraph it came from.
  • Study the bench. Per-judge dossiers with voting record, dissent rate, and frequent co-panelists.

About this corpus

DocketDrift Arizona collates published opinions from the Arizona appellate courts, normalizes them into a structured archive, and surfaces patterns for human review. Source material is in the public record; our role is collation, not interpretation.

Each opinion shows whether it has been reviewed by an editor (cyan dot) or only machine-processed (amber dot). Filtered date defaults to the last 10 years — expand to the full archive via the toggle on the search page.

Read more about methodology →