Arizona
Free, searchable Arizona case law — no account, no paywall.
Opinions of the Arizona Supreme Court and the Arizona Court of Appeals (both divisions), 1866–present. A public-records project.
Opinions per year, 1866–2025 · busiest year 2017 (1,034)
- Free & open Every opinion, free to read and search. No account, no paywall, no charge per search.
- Private by design We never store your searches — there is no research history to subpoena, sell, or leak.
- The court's own words Holdings and quotes come straight from the opinion, verbatim. We never paraphrase or generate legal text.
- 38,252 opinions indexed
- 170 judges (33 currently seated)
- 1866–2026 date range
- 16 legal topics to browse
Most recent activity
All opinions →| Docket | Court | Filed | Disposition | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 CA-CV 26-0284 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 2026-11-12 | Affirmed | WOLLNER v. GUTIERREZ HERNANDEZ |
| 1 CA-CV 26-0319 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 2026-11-12 | Affirmed | HERNANDEZ v. CITY OF GLENDALE |
| 1 CA-CV 26-0413 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 2026-11-12 | Dismissed | Byrd v. Aurora |
| 1 CA-CR 26-0107 PRPC | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 2026-11-10 | Denied | State v. Mendoza |
| 1 CA-CR 25-0437 | Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 | 2026-11-10 | Affirmed | State v. Lopez |
What you can do here
- Search by keyword or by concept. Full-text search across every opinion, plus semantic search that finds cases by idea, not just matching words.
- Jump straight to a citation. Paste a reporter or docket citation and go directly to the opinion.
- See how a case has been treated. For any opinion, see which later cases cite it — and whether they followed, distinguished, or overruled it.
- Read the holding in the court's own words. The operative holding, quoted verbatim and linked to the paragraph it came from.
- Study the bench. Per-judge dossiers with voting record, dissent rate, and frequent co-panelists.
About this corpus
DocketDrift Arizona collates published opinions from the Arizona appellate courts, normalizes them into a structured archive, and surfaces patterns for human review. Source material is in the public record; our role is collation, not interpretation.
Each opinion shows whether it has been reviewed by an editor (cyan dot) or only machine-processed (amber dot). Filtered date defaults to the last 10 years — expand to the full archive via the toggle on the search page.