Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. Lea, 410 P.2d 495.

48 citing documents.

Webb v. Gittlen 174 P.3d 275 Ariz. 2008
Webb v. Gittlen 174 P.3d 275 Ariz. 2008
-41, -98 (1966) (quoting A.R.S.
Martinez v. Green 131 P.3d 492 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Martinez v. Green 131 P.3d 492 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Premium Cigars Intern. v. Farmer-Butler-Leavitt Ins. 96 P.3d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Premium Cigars Intern. v. Farmer-Butler-Leavitt Ins. 96 P.3d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
see, , 253 ¶ 10, (noting an exception to the rule of assignment that would prevent the assignment of personal injury claims).
Botma v. Huser 39 P.3d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Botma v. Huser 39 P.3d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Lingel v. Olbin 8 P.3d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Lingel v. Olbin 8 P.3d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse 945 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Explained Standard Chartered PLC v. Price Waterhouse 945 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
we explained that the non-assignability rule prevents “unscrupulous people” from “traffic[king] in law suits for pain and suffering.” In State Farm Fire & , the supreme court cited Harleysville with approval and reaffirmed “
Lo Piano v. Hunter 840 P.2d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Lo Piano v. Hunter 840 P.2d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. Vargas 754 P.2d 346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. Vargas 754 P.2d 346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Co. v. Lea, 2 Ariz. *19 App. 538
Talley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 670 P.2d 741 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Talley v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 670 P.2d 741 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Karp v. Speizer 647 P.2d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Karp v. Speizer 647 P.2d 1197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior Court 641 P.2d 1275 Ariz. 1982
Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior Court 641 P.2d 1275 Ariz. 1982
Brockman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance 609 P.2d 61 Ariz. 1980
Brockman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance 609 P.2d 61 Ariz. 1980
P.2d 495 (1966); , Restatement, Contracts § 547.
Matter of Estate of Chase 609 P.2d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Matter of Estate of Chase 609 P.2d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Allstate Insurance v. Druke 576 P.2d 489 Ariz. 1978
Allstate Insurance v. Druke 576 P.2d 489 Ariz. 1978
an insured motorist was involved in an automobile accident in which he sustained personal injuries necessitating medical treatment.
Quijada v. Pima County General Hospital 576 P.2d 136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Quijada v. Pima County General Hospital 576 P.2d 136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
The agreement in question does not assign a , , nor does it subrogate the county to rights of appellant or obligate appellant to take action to recover funds to reimburse for medical services received.
Allstate Insurance v. Druke 576 P.2d 503 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Allstate Insurance v. Druke 576 P.2d 503 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
The basis for the respondent court’s denial of Allstate’s
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Vaccari 245 N.W.2d 844 Minn. 1976
Henshaw v. Mays 512 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Henshaw v. Mays 512 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Robert E. McKee General Contractors, Inc. 491 P.2d 27 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Robert E. McKee General Contractors, Inc. 491 P.2d 27 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
State Farm Mutual Insurance v. St. Joseph's Hospital 489 P.2d 837 Ariz. 1971
State Farm Mutual Insurance v. St. Joseph's Hospital 489 P.2d 837 Ariz. 1971
our Court of Appeals continued this policy even though the Arizona State Legislature passed § 14 — 477 which provided for the survival of such personal injury causes of action.
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Knapp 484 P.2d 180 Ariz. 1971
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Knapp 484 P.2d 180 Ariz. 1971
This court, however, , that subrogation amounts to an assignment and that a claim for personal injuries is not assignable: “Although the historical reasons given for the non-assignment of a personal injury claim have been based mostly on the non-survivability of the cause of action, we believe that the non-assignabilit
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Chiate 476 P.2d 527 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Chiate 476 P.2d 527 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
cited by appellee, does not involve discrimination at all, but rather involves a question as to the assignability of tort actions for personal injuries.
Bacchus v. Farmers Insurance Group Exchange 475 P.2d 264 Ariz. 1970
Bacchus v. Farmers Insurance Group Exchange 475 P.2d 264 Ariz. 1970
the Court of Appeals seemingly disapproved of reimbursement albeit on different grounds.
National Union Fire Insurance Company v. Grimes 153 N.W.2d 152 Minn. 1967
Eades v. House 413 P.2d 576 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Eades v. House 413 P.2d 576 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Harrington v. Flanders, 2 Ariz.App.