Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Cano v. Neill, 473 P.2d 487.
-
Hendricks v. Simper
539 P.2d 529
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Moreover, the court cannot weigh the evidence when passing upon the propriety of such a motion
- Johnson v. Elliott 537 P.2d 927 Ariz. 1975
- Johnson v. Elliott 537 P.2d 927 Ariz. 1975
- Lowery v. Turner 506 P.2d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
-
Lowery v. Turner
506 P.2d 1084
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
The plaintiff contends that the accident resulted from the defendant’s own antecedent negligent conduct in his failure to observe the roadway ahead, , where we said: “The instruction [sudden emergency] is only proper when the defendant is free of negligent conduct prior to the ‘emergency’ or crisis and the acts which it precipitates.” (12 Ariz.App.
- Reed v. Hyde 487 P.2d 424 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
-
Reed v. Hyde
487 P.2d 424
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
this Court reviewed in detail prior Arizona decisions relating to the basically discretionary role which the trial judge occupies in ruling on a motion for new trial.
- Stump v. Fitzgerald 484 P.2d 1056 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
- Stump v. Fitzgerald 484 P.2d 1056 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
- Conner v. Brkich 481 P.2d 894 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
- Conner v. Brkich 481 P.2d 894 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
- Brooks v. De La Cruz 473 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
- Brooks v. De La Cruz 473 P.2d 793 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970