Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Torres v. Kennecott Copper Corporation, 488 P.2d 477.

46 citing documents.

Roaf v. Rebuck Consulting Ariz. 2024
Roaf v. Rebuck Consulting Ariz. 2024
See Kopp, 244 Ariz. at 442 ¶ 12 (“If there is an independent ground for finding the principal liable, judgment can be entered against him.” (alteration omitted) ( overruled in part on other grounds by Laurence, 255 Ariz. at 107 ¶ 49)).
Jacob Laurence v. Salt River Project Ariz. 2023
Jacob Laurence v. Salt River Project Ariz. 2023
Ctr., ¶ 12 (App. 2007); abrogated in part as described in Kopp, 244 Ariz. at 442 ¶ 14.
Kopp v. Physician Grp. of Ariz., Inc. 421 P.3d 149 Ariz. 2018
Thomas Kopp v. Physician Group of Az Ariz. 2018
Kopp v. Physician Grp. of Ariz., Inc. 421 P.3d 149 Ariz. 2018
Torres v. Kennecott Copper Corp. , , 274
Thomas Kopp v. Physician Group of Az Ariz. 2018
Thus, we disavow our holding in DeGraff insofar as that case and its progeny conclude that a stipulated dismissal with prejudice “operate[s] as an adjudication that [the dismissed party] was not negligent in the treatment of [the] plaintiff.”
Powell v. Pac. Specialty Ins. Co. 415 P.3d 804 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Powell v. Pac. Specialty Ins. Co. 415 P.3d 804 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Kopp v. Physicians Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Kopp v. Physicians Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶6 The remaining Defendants then moved to dismiss most of the remaining claims against them, P.2d 477 (1971).
Timeless v. Olson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Timeless v. Olson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(holding that employee’s dismissal with prejudice barred plaintiff’s vicarious liability claims against employer where employer’s “liability [wa]s based solely on the negligent acts of [employee]”).
Marika Delgado v. Manor Care of Tucson, Az, Llc,...william Amoureux 378 P.3d 736 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Marika Delgado v. Manor Care of Tucson, Az, Llc,...william Amoureux 378 P.3d 736 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
6 DELGADO v. MANOR CARE HEALTH SERVS., INC. Opinion of the Court P.2d 477 (1971) and Law v. Verde Valley Med.
Gallagher v. Tucson Unified School District 349 P.3d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Gallagher v. Tucson Unified School District 349 P.3d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
-74, -79 (1971); Restatement (Second) of Agency § 217B cmt.
Lorenzo Sanchez, Sr. v. Old Pueblo Anesthesia, Pc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Lorenzo Sanchez, Sr. v. Old Pueblo Anesthesia, Pc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
P. 41(b) (unless court specifies, dismissal is “adjudication upon the merits”); (dismissal with prejudice is judgment on merits).
Law v. Verde Valley Medical Center 170 P.3d 701 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Law v. Verde Valley Medical Center 170 P.3d 701 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
he servant relieves the master of any liability” and that “a dismissal with prejudice is the equivalent of a judgment on the merits.” -70 , -45 (1945) (explaining that release of employee from personal liability also releases employer and that dismissal with prejudice constitutes adjudication on the merits); , (“Here, the order of dismissal with prejudice entered against Dr. Ehrman operated as an adjudication that he was not negligent in the treatment of plaintiff, and this adjudication operates
Crackel v. Allstate Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Crackel v. Allstate Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
(“‘We recognize that where there is independent negligence on the part of the master, the master may be liable, apart from his derivative liability for his servant’s wrongful acts.’”)
Weatherford v. State 54 P.3d 342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Weatherford v. State 54 P.3d 342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Haralson v. Fisher Surveying, Inc. 31 P.3d 114 Ariz. 2001
Haralson v. Fisher Surveying, Inc. 31 P.3d 114 Ariz. 2001
Wiper, 152 Ariz. at 312 , 732 P.2d at 203 ; see also Ford v. Revlon, Inc., , -75, -80 (1971).
Desert Golf Cars v. Yamaha Motor Co. 7 P.3d 112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Desert Golf Cars v. Yamaha Motor Co. 7 P.3d 112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
See, , (dismissal with prejudice only res judicata to claims reasonably framed by pleadings).
Aldrich and Steinberger v. Martin 837 P.2d 1180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Aldrich and Steinberger v. Martin 837 P.2d 1180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Walter v. Simmons 818 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Walter v. Simmons 818 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
See, , (master not liable following dismissal with prejudice of servant where master’s liability is based solely on servant’s negligent acts).
Ford v. Revlon, Inc. 734 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1987
Ford v. Revlon, Inc. 734 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1987
Wiper v. Downtown Development Corp. 732 P.2d 200 Ariz. 1987
Wiper v. Downtown Development Corp. 732 P.2d 200 Ariz. 1987
-75 , -80 (1981) (where hospital’s liability was predicated solely on the negligent acts of its employee/doctor, a judgment in favor of the doctor relieved the hospital of any liability).
Chaney Building Co. v. City of Tucson 716 P.2d 28 Ariz. 1986
Chaney Building Co. v. City of Tucson 716 P.2d 28 Ariz. 1986
Wiper v. Downtown Development Corp. 732 P.2d 197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Wiper v. Downtown Development Corp. 732 P.2d 197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Industrial Park Corp. v. U. S. I. F. Palo Verde Corp. 547 P.2d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Industrial Park Corp. v. U. S. I. F. Palo Verde Corp. 547 P.2d 56 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Hovatter v. Shell Oil Company 529 P.2d 224 Ariz. 1974
Hovatter v. Shell Oil Company 529 P.2d 224 Ariz. 1974