Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Burns v. Herberger, 498 P.2d 536.
- Mesquite v. Ador Ariz. 2024
-
Mesquite v. Ador
Ariz. 2024
–67 (1972), overruled in part on other grounds by Golder, 123 Ariz. at 264–65.
- Hibbs v. Chandler Ginning Co. 790 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
-
Hibbs v. Chandler Ginning Co.
790 P.2d 297
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
overruled on other grounds
- Bella Vista Ranches, Inc. v. Cochise County 767 P.2d 49 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
-
Bella Vista Ranches, Inc. v. Cochise County
767 P.2d 49
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
overruled on other grounds
- Central Citrus Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 760 P.2d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
-
Central Citrus Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue
760 P.2d 562
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
overruled on other grounds, Golder v. Department of Revenue, State Board of Tax Appeals
- Stewart Title & Trust of Tucson v. Pima County 751 P.2d 552 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
-
Stewart Title & Trust of Tucson v. Pima County
751 P.2d 552
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
The history of this subsection, prior to the 1980 amendment, , overruled on other grounds by Golder v. Department of Revenue, State Board of Tax Appeals
- Golder v. Department of Revenue, State Board of Tax Appeals 599 P.2d 216 Ariz. 1979
-
Golder v. Department of Revenue, State Board of Tax Appeals
599 P.2d 216
Ariz. 1979
Because of an apparent conflict between this decision and a previous opinion by the Court of Appeals, Division One, , we granted the taxpayers’ petition for review.
- Grossman v. Westmoreland II Investors 599 P.2d 179 Ariz. 1979
- Grossman v. Westmoreland II Investors 599 P.2d 179 Ariz. 1979
- Golder v. Department of Revenue, State Board of Tax Appeals 599 P.2d 227 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
-
Golder v. Department of Revenue, State Board of Tax Appeals
599 P.2d 227
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
al court err in failing to grant Appellants’ Motion to Strike Solot’s appraisal relating to the Hvidsten property on the grounds that he failed to value Hvidsten’s property as one, large parcel?” Appellant’s
- Honeywell Information Systems, Inc. v. Maricopa County 575 P.2d 801 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
-
Honeywell Information Systems, Inc. v. Maricopa County
575 P.2d 801
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State Tax Comm’n v. United Verde Extension Mining Co.
- County of Maricopa v. North Central Development Co. 556 P.2d 1164 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- County of Maricopa v. North Central Development Co. 556 P.2d 1164 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- Security Properties v. Arizona Department of Property Valuation 537 P.2d 924 Ariz. 1975
- Security Properties v. Arizona Department of Property Valuation 537 P.2d 924 Ariz. 1975
- Yavapai County v. Wilkinson 534 P.2d 735 Ariz. 1975
-
Yavapai County v. Wilkinson
534 P.2d 735
Ariz. 1975
discusses many of the related issues in this case.
- Sherrill & La Follette v. County of Mohave 529 P.2d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- Sherrill & La Follette v. County of Mohave 529 P.2d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- Jackson v. Pressnell 506 P.2d 261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
-
Jackson v. Pressnell
506 P.2d 261
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
For a fair review of the historical background of property assessing
- County of Maricopa v. Chatwin 499 P.2d 190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
-
County of Maricopa v. Chatwin
499 P.2d 190
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
A discussion of the fundamental changes wrought in the Arizona ad valo-rem property tax structure as a result of the Arizona Supreme Court’s 1963 , is set forth in this Court’s , and will not be repeated in detail here.