Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., 501 P.2d 440.

36 citing documents.

Francisco v. Affiliated Urologists Ariz. 2024
Francisco v. Affiliated Urologists Ariz. 2024
Hosp., Inc., see also Seisinger, 220 Ariz. at 94 ¶ 33.
Shafer v. Walgreen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Shafer v. Walgreen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See Faris v. Doctors Hosp., Inc., (res ipsa loquitur does not apply “where there is no evidence that a negligent act of the appellees is more likely to cause the injury than any other possible cause”).
Pompeneo v. Verde Valley Guidance Clinic 249 P.3d 1112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Pompeneo v. Verde Valley Guidance Clinic 249 P.3d 1112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
See Faris v. Doctors Hosp., Inc.
Lorenzo Sanchez, Sr. v. Old Pueblo Anesthesia, Pc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Lorenzo Sanchez, Sr. v. Old Pueblo Anesthesia, Pc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Hosp., Faris v. Doctors Hosp., Inc., 18 Ariz. App. 264, 269, -21, (in general medical malpractice case, departure from standard of care “must be established by expert medical testimony, unless the negligence is so grossly apparent that a layman would have no difficulty in recogn
Lowrey v. Montgomery Kone, Inc. 42 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Lowrey v. Montgomery Kone, Inc. 42 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
¶ 12 , and Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., , but neither case is apposite.
Hunter Contracting Co. v. Superior Court 947 P.2d 892 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Hunter Contracting Co. v. Superior Court 947 P.2d 892 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
But expert testimony is unnecessary to prove professional negligence “when the act or omission comes within the realm of common knowledge.” Id.; , -68 , -44 (1972) (when facts speak for themselves, a plaintiff may forego expert testimony and prove medical negligence by res ipsa loquitur).
Gonzales v. Palo Verde Mental Health Services 783 P.2d 833 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Gonzales v. Palo Verde Mental Health Services 783 P.2d 833 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
We find no logic in her contention that because a doctor owes a patient a fiduciary duty and because a hospital is subject to the same standard of care in a malpractice action as a doctor, Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., , the hospital, therefore, owes a patient a fiduciary duty.
DeMontiney v. Desert Manor Convalescent Center, Inc. 695 P.2d 270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
DeMontiney v. Desert Manor Convalescent Center, Inc. 695 P.2d 270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Finally, the instructions given relating to the applicable standard of care conform with our opinion in Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.
McWain v. Tucson General Hosp. 670 P.2d 1180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
McWain v. Tucson General Hosp. 670 P.2d 1180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
O'Donnell v. Maves, supra ; , Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.
Spelbring v. Pinal County 662 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Spelbring v. Pinal County 662 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.
Sandoval v. Sandoval 623 P.2d 800 Ariz. 1981
Sandoval v. Sandoval 623 P.2d 800 Ariz. 1981
Co. Inc., , Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.
Gulf Insurance v. Grisham 613 P.2d 283 Ariz. 1980
Gulf Insurance v. Grisham 613 P.2d 283 Ariz. 1980
Hegel v. O’Malley Insurance Co., , Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., , Biondo v. General Motors Corporation, 5 Ariz.App.
Mobilife Corp. v. Delta Investment Corp. 592 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Mobilife Corp. v. Delta Investment Corp. 592 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.
Brewer v. Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 589 P.2d 459 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Brewer v. Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 589 P.2d 459 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.
Smith v. John C. Lincoln Hospital 578 P.2d 630 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Smith v. John C. Lincoln Hospital 578 P.2d 630 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
The measure of a hospital’s duty is “to exercise the skill and knowledge normally possessed by like institutions in similar communities.” Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.
Pollard v. Goldsmith 572 P.2d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Pollard v. Goldsmith 572 P.2d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Taking all inferences from the record in a light most favorable to the appellants, Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., , we believe that the evidence in the record showing the type of expert testimony which will be available at trial is sufficient to overcome a motion for summary judgment.
Taylor v. Mueller 539 P.2d 517 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Taylor v. Mueller 539 P.2d 517 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.
Falcher v. St. Luke's Hospital Medical Center 506 P.2d 287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Falcher v. St. Luke's Hospital Medical Center 506 P.2d 287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
e where a semi-conscious, totally dependent plaintiff, while unattended and unobserved by any hospital employee or attending doctor, falls from a cart in the emergency room of the defendant hospital, thereby sustaining injuries.” We recently discussed the application of the res ipsa loqtiitur doctrine to medical malpractice cases and reviewed the applicable law in Faris v. Doctors Hospital, Inc., , and we do not deem it necessary to repeat that analysis here.