Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Anderson Aviation Sales Company, Inc. v. Perez, 508 P.2d 87.
- Aspen v. Wakefield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Aspen v. Wakefield
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
It should never be granted for a disciplinary measure, but only to prevent a miscarriage of justice.”
- Tarter v. Bendt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Tarter v. Bendt
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-13 (1951); (finding answer on cross-examination that included insurance when discussing circumstances in which the witness would rent aircraft did not constitute grounds for mistrial).
- Hawkins v. Secura Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Hawkins v. Secura
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Anderson Aviation Sales Co.
- Ghosoph v. Kottmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Ghosoph v. Kottmann
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
actually influenced the verdict.’” ¶ 51 (App. 2009) (quoting Anderson Aviation Sales Co., ).
- Sandretto v. Payson Healthcare Management, Inc. 322 P.3d 168 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
-
Sandretto v. Payson Healthcare Management, Inc.
322 P.3d 168
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
(no abuse of discretion in denying continuance where one of the defense attorneys was disbarred on opening day of trial); see also Barmat, 165 Ariz. at 210, 797 P.2d at 1228 (no abuse of discretion in denying further discovery into settlement agreement).
- Cal X-Tra v. W.V.S v. Holdings, L.L.C. 276 P.3d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
-
Cal X-Tra v. W.V.S v. Holdings, L.L.C.
276 P.3d 11
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Ritchie, 221 Ariz. at 303, ¶ 51 , 211 P.3d at 1287 ( , ); , ("[A party] does not forfeit the right to assert [an opponent’s] misconduct as a basis for sustaining the trial court’s new trial order if the trial court finds the impropriety sufficient to warrant a new t
- Ritchie v. Krasner 211 P.3d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
-
Ritchie v. Krasner
211 P.3d 1272
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
” Anderson Aviation Sales Co.
- Tellez v. Saban 933 P.2d 1233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
-
Tellez v. Saban
933 P.2d 1233
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
b. Nor are we persuaded by the dissent’s
- Life Investors Insurance Co. of America v. Horizon Resources Bethany, Ltd. 898 P.2d 478 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
-
Life Investors Insurance Co. of America v. Horizon Resources Bethany, Ltd.
898 P.2d 478
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Anderson Aviation Sales Co.
- Alaface v. National Investment Co. 892 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
-
Alaface v. National Investment Co.
892 P.2d 1375
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
496 , Carrillo v. El Mirage Roadhouse, Inc.
- State v. Schaefer 790 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
-
State v. Schaefer
790 P.2d 281
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
(to warrant reversal, improper conduct of counsel must appear to have influenced verdict).
- Catchings v. City of Glendale 743 P.2d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
-
Catchings v. City of Glendale
743 P.2d 400
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
They also contend that the violations warranted the giving of a negligence per se instruction to the jury
- McGuire v. Caterpillar Tractor Co. 728 P.2d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
-
McGuire v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.
728 P.2d 290
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Appellant’s argument cannot be said to be merely a response to Caterpillar’s argument since its scope went far beyond that of Caterpillar’ , in which the trial court found that there was no indication the improper conduct had actually influenced the verdict, and the court of appeals affirmed that finding.
- Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents 711 P.2d 1207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
-
Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents
711 P.2d 1207
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Anderson Aviation Sales Co., Inc. v. Perez, 19 Ariz. *541 App. 422
- Quinonez on Behalf of Quinonez v. Andersen 696 P.2d 1342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
-
Quinonez on Behalf of Quinonez v. Andersen
696 P.2d 1342
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
See Anderson Aviation Sales Company
- Ring v. Taylor 685 P.2d 121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
-
Ring v. Taylor
685 P.2d 121
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
See Anderson Aviation Sales Company, , Rule 59(a), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure.
- Matter of Estate of Kerr 667 P.2d 1351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- Valley National Bank v. Dykstra 667 P.2d 1351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
-
Matter of Estate of Kerr
667 P.2d 1351
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Anderson Aviation Sales Co., , , , cert.
-
Valley National Bank v. Dykstra
667 P.2d 1351
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Anderson Aviation Sales Co., , Modla v. Parker, 17 Ariz.App.
- Dunlap v. Jimmy GMC of Tucson, Inc. 666 P.2d 83 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
-
Dunlap v. Jimmy GMC of Tucson, Inc.
666 P.2d 83
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Anderson Aviation Sales Company
- Howard v. Associated Grocers 601 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1979
-
Howard v. Associated Grocers
601 P.2d 593
Ariz. 1979
Anderson Aviation Sales Co.
- Kelman v. Bohi 550 P.2d 671 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
-
Kelman v. Bohi
550 P.2d 671
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Anderson Aviation Sales Co., at 429 , at 94 (1973).
- Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix 533 P.2d 73 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
-
Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix
533 P.2d 73
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
See Anderson Aviation Sales Co., , and Purcell v. Zimbelman, 18 Ariz.App.
- Woods v. Harker 523 P.2d 1320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
-
Woods v. Harker
523 P.2d 1320
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Anderson Aviation Sales Co., , , Ulan v. Richtars, 8 Ariz.App.