Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ellingson v. Fuller, 513 P.2d 1339.

28 citing documents.

Ford v. Erickson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Ford v. Erickson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In re United States Currency In Amount of $26,980.00 18 P.3d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
In re United States Currency In Amount of $26,980.00 18 P.3d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Miller v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF PINAL CTY. 855 P.2d 1357 Ariz. 1993
Miller v. Board of Supervisors 855 P.2d 1357 Ariz. 1993
Miller v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF PINAL CTY. 855 P.2d 1357 Ariz. 1993
Gilliland, 77 Ariz. at 167 , 268 P.2d at 337 ; see Elliott, 165 Ariz. at 131 , 796 P.2d at 933 ; Post, 160 Ariz. at 7 , 770 P.2d at 311
Miller v. Board of Supervisors 855 P.2d 1357 Ariz. 1993
Findings of fact satisfy this requirement if they are sufficiently specific to allow an appellate court “to test the validity of the judgment.” Gilliland, 77 Ariz. at 167 , 268 P.2d at 337 ; see Elliott, 165 Ariz. at 131 , 796 P.2d at 933 ; Post, 160 Ariz. at 7 , 770 P.2d at 311
Lewis v. Pleasant Country, Ltd. 840 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Lewis v. Pleasant Country, Ltd. 840 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Rorebeck v. Criste, 1 Ariz.App.
Marriage of Elliott v. Elliott 796 P.2d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Marriage of Elliott v. Elliott 796 P.2d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
2 Ellingson v. Fuller, 20 Ariz. *132 App. 456
Reed v. Reed 740 P.2d 963 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Reed v. Reed 740 P.2d 963 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
SMITH, Arizona Practice § 421 (1986).
Ziggy's Opportunities, Inc. v. I-10 Industrial Park Developers 730 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Ziggy's Opportunities, Inc. v. I-10 Industrial Park Developers 730 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
§§ 12-521, 12-526; see Ellingson v. Fuller, 20 Ariz App. 456, 458
Miller v. McAlister 728 P.2d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Miller v. McAlister 728 P.2d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Jones v. Teilborg 727 P.2d 18 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Jones v. Teilborg 727 P.2d 18 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Grand Real Estate, Inc. v. Sirignano 676 P.2d 642 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Grand Real Estate, Inc. v. Sirignano 676 P.2d 642 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
This is but an application of the general rule that while, absent a request for findings of fact, a trial judge is not required to set forth the underlying *15 factual basis for his ultimate decision, , , nevertheless, the judgment of a trial court must find some reasonable support from the evidence or lack of evidence.
Cisneros v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 660 P.2d 1228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Cisneros v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 660 P.2d 1228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Tena v. Yorgulez 538 P.2d 398 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
Tena v. Yorgulez 538 P.2d 398 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
See also, Silva v. Romney, 473 F.2d 287 (1st Cir. 1973)
Campbell Estates, Inc. v. Bates 517 P.2d 515 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Campbell Estates, Inc. v. Bates 517 P.2d 515 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973