Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Homes & Son Construction Co., Inc. v. Bolo Corp., 526 P.2d 1258.

37 citing documents.

monroe/pirtle v. Gagan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
monroe/pirtle v. Gagan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Id.; see also Homes & (explaining that “[m]ere differences of opinion as to the amount” of a judgment will not preclude awarding prejudgment interest).
Precision Heavy Haul, Inc. v. Trail King Industries, Inc. 228 P.3d 895 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Precision Heavy Haul, Inc. v. Trail King Industries, Inc. 228 P.3d 895 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
(wrongfully discharged employee was entitled to prejudgment interest on each paycheck as it came due, even if employer disputed its liability); Homes & Son Const. Co., , (“Mere differences of opinion as to the amount due” under a contract will not preclude pre-judgment interest.); cf. Pueblo Santa Fe Townhomes Owner’s Ass’n v. Transcont’l Ins.
Gorman v. State ex rel. Owens 155 P.3d 1054 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Gorman v. State ex rel. Owens 155 P.3d 1054 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6 93 P.3d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6 93 P.3d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Alta Vista Plaza, Ltd. v. Insulation Specialists Co. 919 P.2d 176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Alta Vista Plaza, Ltd. v. Insulation Specialists Co. 919 P.2d 176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
La Paz County v. Yuma County 735 P.2d 772 Ariz. 1987
Trimble v. American Savings Life Insurance 733 P.2d 1131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Trimble v. American Savings Life Insurance 733 P.2d 1131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Homes & -07 , -62 (1974) (dictum).
Trus Joist Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 735 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Trus Joist Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 735 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Homes & Sons Const. Co.
State Compensation Fund v. Nelson 737 P.2d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State Compensation Fund v. Nelson 737 P.2d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
See Homes & Son Construction Co.
Phil Bramsen Distributor, Inc. v. Mastroni 726 P.2d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Phil Bramsen Distributor, Inc. v. Mastroni 726 P.2d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Homes & Son Construction Company
Malecky v. Malecky 713 P.2d 322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Malecky v. Malecky 713 P.2d 322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
In Homes and Son Construction Co., , the court, citing Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. O’Malley Lumber Co., 14 Ariz.App.
Rawlings v. Apodaca 726 P.2d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Rawlings v. Apodaca 726 P.2d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Transamerica Insurance v. Trout 701 P.2d 851 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Transamerica Insurance v. Trout 701 P.2d 851 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Homes & Son Construction Co.
Northern Arizona Gas Service, Inc. v. Petrolane Transport, Inc. 702 P.2d 696 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Northern Arizona Gas Service, Inc. v. Petrolane Transport, Inc. 702 P.2d 696 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
A claim is liquidated “if the evidence furnishes data which, if believed, makes it possible to compute the amount with exactness, without reliance upon opinion or discretion.” Homes & Son Construction Co.
Fleming v. Pima County 685 P.2d 1301 Ariz. 1984
Fleming v. Pima County 685 P.2d 1301 Ariz. 1984
Banner Realty, supra; Arizona Title Ins., supra; Homes & Son Construction Co., , , 224 P. 1057, 1061 (1924) (“Interest is computed upon sums definitely known, or that may be ascertained by arithmetical computation”).
New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. State 696 P.2d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. State 696 P.2d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Homes and Sons Construction Co.
Suciu v. AMFAC Distributing Corp. 675 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Suciu v. AMFAC Distributing Corp. 675 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
852 (1968); and see also, Homes & Sons Construction Co., , 526 The trial court is directed to modify the judgment to include interest from December 31, 1979, and as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co. 603 P.2d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co. 603 P.2d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Cf. Homes & Son Construction Co., , where this Court recognized that a cost-plus claim could be liquidated.
Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix 533 P.2d 73 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix 533 P.2d 73 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
486, 496 , Homes & Son Construction Co.