Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Campbell v. SUPERIOR CT, IN & FOR CTY. OF MARICOPA, 501 P.2d 463.

26 citing documents.

Revive v. Shea-Connelly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Revive v. Shea-Connelly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Courts may apply issue preclusion to a decision of an administrative agency when the agency is acting in a judicial capacity and that decision resolves issues of fact “which the parties have had an adequate opportunity to litigate.” (quoting United States v. Utah Constr.
Chavez v. Roosevelt School Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Chavez v. Roosevelt School Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
“Where the statute gives the discretion and final determination to a lower board or commission and makes such determination final and conclusive, it has such conclusive effect only in the absence of an appeal to the superior court.” Campbell v. Superior Court (Ballard), ( modified, ).
Falcone Brothers & Associates, Inc. v. City of Tucson 381 P.3d 276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Falcone Brothers & Associates, Inc. v. City of Tucson 381 P.3d 276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Hawkins v. State, Dept. of Economic SEC. 900 P.2d 1236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Hawkins v. State, Dept. of Economic SEC. 900 P.2d 1236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
The res judicata *104 doctrine “ ‘rests upon considerations of economy of judicial time and public policy favoring the establishment of certainty in legal relations.’ ” , (quoting Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Sunnen, 333 U.S. 591, 597 , 68 S.Ct.
Western Insulated Glass Co. v. McKay 852 P.2d 412 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Western Insulated Glass Co. v. McKay 852 P.2d 412 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Hibbs v. Calcot, Ltd. 801 P.2d 445 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Hibbs v. Calcot, Ltd. 801 P.2d 445 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
This court noted the general applicability of the *215
Gilbert v. Board of Medical Examiners 745 P.2d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Gilbert v. Board of Medical Examiners 745 P.2d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Casillas v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 739 P.2d 800 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Casillas v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 739 P.2d 800 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Lans v. Mutual Life Insurance 699 P.2d 1299 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Lans v. Mutual Life Insurance 699 P.2d 1299 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
: Under rules of statutory construction, all statutes dealing with the same subject matter must be read together and meaning given to each statute____ Moreover, courts are admonished to avoid a construction of statutes which would render them meaningless or of no effect, [citations omitt
J.W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. v. Arizona State Registrar of Contractors 690 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
J.W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. v. Arizona State Registrar of Contractors 690 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
this court stated: The great weight of authority holds that the judicial doctrine of res judicata is part of administrative law.
Farmers Investment Co. v. Arizona State Land Department 666 P.2d 469 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Farmers Investment Co. v. Arizona State Land Department 666 P.2d 469 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Hurst v. Bisbee Unified School District No. Two 607 P.2d 391 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Hurst v. Bisbee Unified School District No. Two 607 P.2d 391 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Yavapai County v. Wilkinson 534 P.2d 735 Ariz. 1975
Yavapai County v. Wilkinson 534 P.2d 735 Ariz. 1975