Cited by

.” Smitty’s Super-Valu, (internal citations omitted).

Smitty's Super-Valu, (citations omitted).

See Smitty’s Super-Valu, (“The boundaries of the arbitrators’ powers are defined by the agreement of the parties.”).

See e.g., Smitty’s Super-Valu, Inc., v. Pasqualetti, Atreus, 229 Ariz. at 506, ¶ 13.

See Smitty’s Super-Valu, (within the boundaries of the parties’ agreement, “the arbitrators’ decision is final both as to questions of fact and law”).

See Smitty’s Super-Valu, –81 (App. 1974).

Smitty’s Super-Valu, –181 (App. 1974).

Co., Inc., (quoting Smitty’s Super-Valu, ).

Smitty's Super-Valu, -81 (App. 1974) ("[E]ven though a court reviewing an arbitration award might consider erroneous some rulings on questions of law, the rulings made by the arbitrators are binding unless they result in extending the arbitration beyond the scope of the submission.").

“[The] party attacking the award has the burden of showing that the arbitrator[] exceeded [his] powers under the [agreement].” Smitty’s Super-Valu

Within those boundaries, the arbitrators’ decision is final both as to questions of fact and law.” Smitty’s Super–Valu, (internal citations omitted); see also Atreus, 229 Ariz. at 506, ¶ 13, 277 P.3d at 211; Transnational Ins.

Smitty’s Super-Valu, - 81 (1974).

Smitty's Super- Valu, -81 (1974); ("[A]n arbitration award is not subject to attack merely because one party believes that the arbitrators erred with 1 Absent material revision after the relevant date, we cite a statute's current version.

See Smitty’s Super-Valu, (“decisions of the arbitrators on questions of fact .

¶ 13, (citation omitted); Smitty’s Super-Valu, -81, (citations omitted).

Group of Ariz. v. Stardust Dev., Inc., ¶ 13, ("boundaries of [an] arbitrator[’s] powers are defined by the agreement of the parties") (quoting Smitty's Super-Valu, ).

The “boundaries of [an] arbitrator's] powers are defined by the agreement of the parties.” Smitty’s Super-Valu

Co., , (quoting Smitty’s Super-Valu, , ).

Smitty’s Super-Vahi, Inc. v. Pasqualetti

Cf. Smitty’s Supervalu, , (holding that the parties, having chosen a different tribunal, may not reinstate judicial tribunals to resolve the controversy).

Cf. Smitty's Super-Valu, , (holding that the parties, having chosen a different tribunal, may not reinstate judicial tribunals to resolve the controversy).

See Smitty’s Super-Valu, , (“Within the confines of the arbitration, the decision of the arbitrators as to the facts and law is final and cannot be reversed by a court, even if the court believes it to be erroneous.”).