Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Allison Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Superior Court, 511 P.2d 198.

32 citing documents.

State Farm Insurance Companies v. Premier Manufactured Systems, Inc. 142 P.3d 1232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
State Farm Insurance Companies v. Premier Manufactured Systems, Inc. 142 P.3d 1232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
(absent its own active participation in creation of defect causing injury, retailer may seek indemnity from manufacturer).
Cella Barr Associates, Inc. v. Cohen 868 P.2d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Cella Barr Associates, Inc. v. Cohen 868 P.2d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Sequoia Manufacturing Company
Falcon v. Beverly Hills Mortgage Corp. 802 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Falcon v. Beverly Hills Mortgage Corp. 802 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
all merely stand for the proposition that in product liability cases a manufacturer who has been given an opportunity to defend an action against its distributor may be bound by a judgment in the case.
Foremost-McKesson Corp. v. Allied Chemical Co. 680 P.2d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Foremost-McKesson Corp. v. Allied Chemical Co. 680 P.2d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
King & Johnson Rental Equipment Co. v. Superior Court 599 P.2d 212 Ariz. 1979
King & Johnson Rental Equipment Co. v. Superior Court 599 P.2d 212 Ariz. 1979
King & Johnson Rental Equipment Co. v. Superior Court 599 P.2d 232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
King & Johnson Rental Equipment Co. v. Superior Court 599 P.2d 232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc., , , reh.
Litton Systems, Inc. v. Shaw's Sales & Service, Ltd. 579 P.2d 48 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Litton Systems, Inc. v. Shaw's Sales & Service, Ltd. 579 P.2d 48 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Allison Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, Division Three, , Krasse v. Del E. Webb Development Corporation, 26 Ariz.App.
Ewing v. Goettl's Metal Products Co. 569 P.2d 1382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Ewing v. Goettl's Metal Products Co. 569 P.2d 1382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Under such circumstances, since Arizona does not recognize a right of contribution between active joint tort-feasors, , Transcon Lines v. Barnes, 17 Ariz.App.
Sequoia Manufacturing Co. v. Halec Construction Co. 570 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Sequoia Manufacturing Co. v. Halec Construction Co. 570 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
SEQUOIA v. MARICOPA Maricopa’s , that a retailer, or lessor, as here, of a defective product, which causes damage for which the lessor is held strictly liable because of its position in the chain of those placing the defective product in the stream of commerce, may, absent active participation in the creation of the defect causi
Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Corbin-Dykes Electric Co. 559 P.2d 1067 Ariz. 1976
Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Corbin-Dykes Electric Co. 559 P.2d 1067 Ariz. 1976
Transcon Lines v. Barnes, 17 Ariz.App.
Krasse v. Del E. Webb Development Corporation 549 P.2d 207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Krasse v. Del E. Webb Development Corporation 549 P.2d 207 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Co. v. Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, , : It is also true that the retailer of the product, absent active participation in' the creation of the defects causing the injury, may seek indemnity from the manufacturer whose process created the defect.
Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc. 542 P.2d 1102 Ariz. 1976
Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc. 542 P.2d 1102 Ariz. 1976
Allison then filed a petition for special action in the Court of Appeals, P.2d 198 (1973).
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. City of Scottsdale 537 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. City of Scottsdale 537 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Transcon Lines v. Barnes, 17 Ariz.App.
Desert Steel Co. v. SUPERIOR CT., CTY. OF MARICOPA 526 P.2d 1077 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Desert Steel Co. v. SUPERIOR CT., CTY. OF MARICOPA 526 P.2d 1077 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
All parties to this action request us to take jurisdiction on the basis of Allison *280 , and Chrysler Corp. v. McCarthy, 14 Ariz.App.
Allison Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Superior Court 523 P.2d 803 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
Allison Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Superior Court 523 P.2d 803 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
City of Phoenix v. Kenly 519 P.2d 1159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
City of Phoenix v. Kenly 519 P.2d 1159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Transcon Lines v. Barnes, 17 Ariz.App.