Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Sloan v. Florida-Vanderbilt Development Corp., 529 P.2d 726.
- Arizona Off Duty v. Good Vibe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Arizona Off Duty v. Good Vibe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- D.T. v. C.L Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
D.T. v. C.L
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Corp., (“[I]n a default hearing pursuant to [civil] Rule 55(b), there is no duty on the part of a party either to present all of its evidence in support of his claim for damages or to offer evidence in his possession with 3 We apply case law interpreting the civil rules when the language of those rule
- Trisha A. v. Dcs 424 P.3d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Trisha A. v. Dcs 424 P.3d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Baker International Associates, Inc. v. Shanwick International Corp. 851 P.2d 1379 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
-
Baker International Associates, Inc. v. Shanwick International Corp.
851 P.2d 1379
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
The “burden of explanation as to why a party has not responded to lawful service of process is placed upon the *584 party seeking to set aside a default judgment.”
- FLOOD CONTROL DIST. OF MARICOPA CTY. v. Conlin 712 P.2d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
-
FLOOD CONTROL DIST. OF MARICOPA CTY. v. Conlin
712 P.2d 979
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
539 , P.2d 726 (1974); Vander Wagen v. Hughes, 19 Ariz.App.
- Bickerstaff v. Denny's Restaurant, Inc. 688 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1984
- Bickerstaff v. Denny's Restaurant, Inc. 688 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1984
- Bickerstaff v. Denny's Restaurant, Inc. 688 P.2d 673 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- Bickerstaff v. Denny's Restaurant, Inc. 688 P.2d 673 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- Webb v. Erickson 655 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1982
- Webb v. Erickson 655 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1982
- Parks v. Rawson 657 P.2d 908 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
- Parks v. Rawson 657 P.2d 908 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
- Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC. 652 P.2d 1035 Ariz. 1982
- Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC. 652 P.2d 1035 Ariz. 1982
- Webb v. Erickson 655 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
-
Webb v. Erickson
655 P.2d 15
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
this court set forth the general principles governing our review of the trial court’s decision: [W]e must carefully scrutinize the record before us to see if there exists a reason under Rule 60(c) by which the exercise of discretion was justified.
- East v. Hedges 608 P.2d 327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- East v. Hedges 608 P.2d 327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- Western Coach Corp. v. Mark V Mobile Homes Sales, Inc. 534 P.2d 760 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- Western Coach Corp. v. Mark V Mobile Homes Sales, Inc. 534 P.2d 760 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975