Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix, 533 P.2d 73.

50 citing documents.

Lakeside v. Meyers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Lakeside v. Meyers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“A creditor is entitled to interest on his claim prior to judgment, provided the sum demanded is liquidated.” Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix
monroe/pirtle v. Gagan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
monroe/pirtle v. Gagan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix
Berry v. 352 E. Virginia, L.L.C. 261 P.3d 784 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Berry v. 352 E. Virginia, L.L.C. 261 P.3d 784 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
But “[a] claim is liquidated if the plaintiff provides a basis for precisely calculating the amounts owed.” John C. Lincoln, 208 Ariz. at 544, ¶ 39 , 96 P.3d at 542 ; see also Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix, , (liquidated claim exists if claimant’s information were believed and would permit an amount to be calculated “with exactness, without reliance upon opinion or discretion”).
Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6 93 P.3d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Ry-Tan Construction, Inc. v. Washington Elementary School District No. 6 93 P.3d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
See Contanzo [Costanzo] v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix, -17, 533 [P].2d 73, 76-77 (App.1975).
Matter of Estate of Miles 837 P.2d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Matter of Estate of Miles 837 P.2d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix
Hall v. Schulte 836 P.2d 989 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Hall v. Schulte 836 P.2d 989 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
In determining whether a claim is liquidated, the court must inquire whether “the claim [is] one which ‘makes it possible to compute the amount with exactness without reliance upon opinion or discretion.’ ” , (quoting Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix, , ).
Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 759 P.2d 602 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 759 P.2d 602 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix
Trus Joist Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 735 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Trus Joist Corp. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 735 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phx.
State Compensation Fund v. Nelson 737 P.2d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
State Compensation Fund v. Nelson 737 P.2d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
See, e.g., Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix
Creative Builders, Inc. v. Avenue Developments, Inc. 715 P.2d 308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Creative Builders, Inc. v. Avenue Developments, Inc. 715 P.2d 308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Arizona Title Insurance and Trust Co. v. O’Malley Lumber Co., 14 Ariz.App.
Marcus v. Fox 723 P.2d 691 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Marcus v. Fox 723 P.2d 691 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Cortanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix
Prendergast v. City of Tempe 691 P.2d 726 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Prendergast v. City of Tempe 691 P.2d 726 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
at 81 , 654 P.2d at 15 , quoting Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix
Lake Havasu Community Hospital, Inc. v. Arizona Title Insurance 687 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
LAKE HAVASU COM. HOSP. v. Ariz. Title Ins. 687 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
LAKE HAVASU COM. HOSP. v. Ariz. Title Ins. 687 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Costanzo v. Stewart Title & *378 Trust of Phoenix
Lake Havasu Community Hospital, Inc. v. Arizona Title Insurance 687 P.2d 371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Costanzo v. Stewart Title & *378 Trust of Phoenix
ELAR INVESTMENTS v. Southwest Culvert Co. 676 P.2d 659 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
ELAR INVESTMENTS v. Southwest Culvert Co. 676 P.2d 659 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix
Suciu v. AMFAC Distributing Corp. 675 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Suciu v. AMFAC Distributing Corp. 675 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix
Estate of Estes v. Valley National Bank 654 P.2d 4 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Estate of Estes v. Valley National Bank 654 P.2d 4 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
The pivotal question is whether the claims involved here are “liquidated,” that is, is the claim one which “makes it possible to compute the amount with exactness without reliance upon opinion or discretion.” Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix
Jobe v. King 629 P.2d 1031 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Distinguished Jobe v. King 629 P.2d 1031 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust, , cited by appellants, is distinguishable.
Chapin v. Klein 623 P.2d 1250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Chapin v. Klein 623 P.2d 1250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Fogleman v. Peruvian Associates 622 P.2d 63 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Fogleman v. Peruvian Associates 622 P.2d 63 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix, , L. M. White Contracting Co. v. St.
Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co. 603 P.2d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co. 603 P.2d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Banner Realty, , Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix
Leone v. PRECISION PLBG. & HEAT. OF SO. ARIZ. 591 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Leone v. Precision Plumbing & Heating of Southern Arizona, Inc. 591 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Leone v. Precision Plumbing & Heating of Southern Arizona, Inc. 591 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix
Leone v. PRECISION PLBG. & HEAT. OF SO. ARIZ. 591 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix
Nogales Service Center v. Atlantic Richfield Co. 582 P.2d 642 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Nogales Service Center v. Atlantic Richfield Co. 582 P.2d 642 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
See Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix, P.2d 73 (1975).
Ewing v. Goettl's Metal Products Co. 569 P.2d 1382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Ewing v. Goettl's Metal Products Co. 569 P.2d 1382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
e the form of certain common law indemnity theories, , express contractual indemnity provision, Southern Pacific Co. v. Gila River Ranch, Inc., supra, or it may be based on other contractual relationships furnishing a basis for a “claim-over” against the third-party defendant, as is illustrated in Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust