Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Savage v. Thompson, 523 P.2d 110.

27 citing documents.

State v. Davis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
In Re the Marriage of Rojas 530 P.3d 1167 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
In Re the Marriage of Rojas 530 P.3d 1167 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
¶35 divorcing spouses signed a written agreement whereby the husband would pay the wife $150 per month in child support for each of the parties’ children until they reached twenty-one years of age or married.
Marriage of LaPrade v. LaPrade 941 P.2d 1268 Ariz. 1997
Marriage of LaPrade v. LaPrade 941 P.2d 1268 Ariz. 1997
(stating that where merger has not occurred, “rights arising out of the separation agreement can only be enforced by bringing a separate action on the contract, by obtaining a judgment thereon and then enforcing it as any other civil judgment”), overruled on other grounds
Steiner v. Steiner 880 P.2d 1152 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Steiner v. Steiner 880 P.2d 1152 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
This court’s , cited by neither party, also supports the husband’s contention.
Solomon v. Findley 808 P.2d 294 Ariz. 1991
Solomon v. Findley 808 P.2d 294 Ariz. 1991
Solomon v. Findley 796 P.2d 477 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Solomon v. Findley 796 P.2d 477 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Anonymous Wife v. Anonymous Husband 739 P.2d 794 Ariz. 1987
Anonymous Wife v. Anonymous Husband 739 P.2d 794 Ariz. 1987
554 , , Saxon v. Riddel, 16 Ariz.App.
Anonymous Wife v. Anonymous Husband 739 P.2d 791 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Anonymous Wife v. Anonymous Husband 739 P.2d 791 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
554 , , and Saxon v. Riddel, 16 Ariz.App.
Young v. Burkholder 690 P.2d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Young v. Burkholder 690 P.2d 134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Marriage of Andrews v. Andrews 612 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Marriage of Andrews v. Andrews 612 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Helber v. Frazelle 575 P.2d 1243 Ariz. 1978
Helber v. Frazelle 575 P.2d 1243 Ariz. 1978
In 1974, , , the Court of Appeals correctly interpreted Ruhsam to the effect that where there was no merger, rights arising out of the separation agreement can only be enforced by bringing a separate action on the contract, by obtaining a judgment thereon and then enforcing it as any other civil judgment.
Helber v. Frazelle 575 P.2d 1256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Helber v. Frazelle 575 P.2d 1256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
The father filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that, , the divorce court was without jurisdiction to grant the relief requested.
Marshick v. Marshick 545 P.2d 436 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Marshick v. Marshick 545 P.2d 436 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
(Emphasis added) See, , State ex rel.
Stanley v. Stanley 535 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Stanley v. Stanley 535 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Cordova v. Cordova, 21 Ariz.App.