Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. McNeill, 556 P.2d 803.

25 citing documents.

flash/schillinger v. Samons Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
flash/schillinger v. Samons Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(looking to what the parties “can objectively determine from the face of the contracting document to be conditions precedent”).
Anderson v. Country Life Insurance 886 P.2d 1381 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Anderson v. Country Life Insurance 886 P.2d 1381 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
(premise that upon payment of premium there is reasonable expectation of coverage is *633 unsupported and has led to questionable results).
Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 742 P.2d 277 Ariz. 1987
Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 742 P.2d 277 Ariz. 1987
Statewide Insurance v. Dewar 694 P.2d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Criticized Statewide Insurance v. Dewar 694 P.2d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Cain v. Aetna Life Insurance 659 P.2d 1334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Cain v. Aetna Life Insurance 659 P.2d 1334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
this court found that an insurable risk type of conditional receipt can give rise to a temporary contract of insurance, even in the absence of the issuance of an insurance policy, provided that “objective” conditions precedent to such coverage are met.
State v. Worth 641 P.2d 1312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Worth 641 P.2d 1312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Corral v. Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance 630 P.2d 1055 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Corral v. Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance 630 P.2d 1055 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
quoting from the classifications stated in the Maryland case of Simpson v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, 227 Md.
Noble v. National American Life Insurance 624 P.2d 866 Ariz. 1981
Noble v. National American Life Insurance 624 P.2d 866 Ariz. 1981
Lazard v. Medlen 624 P.2d 322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Lazard v. Medlen 624 P.2d 322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Assuming issuance of a conditional receipt would have created temporary coverage, , the agent’s failure to fill out and deliver the receipt to the applicants would not render the coverage ineffective.
Fogleman v. Peruvian Associates 622 P.2d 63 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Fogleman v. Peruvian Associates 622 P.2d 63 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Noble v. National American Life Insurance 624 P.2d 874 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Noble v. National American Life Insurance 624 P.2d 874 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
367, , indicate a previous acceptance in Arizona of the “first party” tort liability principle of the California cases, we do not believe that they can be so read.
Pawelczyk v. Allied Life Insurance 583 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Pawelczyk v. Allied Life Insurance 583 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
for a discussion of the commonly used forms of binders and conditional receipts and the legal effects thereof.
State v. Wood 564 P.2d 405 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by