Cited by

Accordingly, challenges to the validity of title can neither be raised nor resolved in such a proceeding, though “the fact of title may be proved as a matter incidental to showing right of possession by an owner.” A.R.S.

An FED action offers rightful landowners “a summary and speedy remedy for obtaining possession.”

(recognizing that a major purpose of the trustee’s sale statutes is “to provide relatively inexpensive and speedy foreclosure proceedings”); cf. Pappas v. E. Sav.

7 see Morgan AZ Fin., 235 Ariz. at 23, ¶ 7, 326 P.3d at 290 (noting trustee’s sales “are meant to operate quickly and efficiently, ‘outside of the judicial process.’”) (quoting Hogan v. Wash.

Evans v. J Four Realty, LLC, 164 N.H. 570, 574 , 62 A3d 869, 874 (2013) (tenant at sufferance is not “in a landlord-tenant relationship”; it is not a “tenancy in fact” because there is no privity between landlord and tenant).

§ 12-1171 did not apply even though the parties thought that they had a landlord-tenant relationship.); , (Despite the lack of a landlord-tenant relationship, a former property owner became a tenant at sufferance when he failed to surrender possession upon foreclosure of his interest in the deed of trust.).

§ 12-1173 was broad enough to authorize a forcible detainer action to obtain possession of property after an occupant’s interest had been terminated pursuant to a nonjudicial sale because “[o]ne who remains in possession of property after termination of his interest under a deed of trust is a tenant at will or sufferance.”

5 The forcible entry and detainer proceeding contained in this statute applies to a “holdover by a person to whom lands, tenements, or real property were let.” , in support of its argument that a forcible entry and detainer action is appropriate here because such actions are not limited to the formal lessor-lessee relationship.