Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Pruett v. Precision Plumbing, Inc., 554 P.2d 655.

31 citing documents.

Ja framing/copperpoint v. Rivera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Ja framing/copperpoint v. Rivera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
–92 (1976) (quotation omitted).
harte/travelers v. vasquez/special fund/ramirez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
harte/travelers v. vasquez/special fund/ramirez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
(a general contractor’s “right to order the work stopped or resumed, to inspect its progress or to receive reports, to make suggestions or recommendations .
Martin v. Royal Sign Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Martin v. Royal Sign Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Granger, (affirming judgment following jury trial on negligent design claim arising out of flooding damage); (affirming directed verdict on personal injury claim); Shannon v. Butler Homes, Inc., (affirming in part and reversing in part motion to dismiss or for judgment on the pleadings in personal injury design defect case).
State v. FAR WEST WATER & SEWER INC. 228 P.3d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. FAR WEST WATER & SEWER INC. 228 P.3d 909 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
for the proposition that under the savings clause, "OSHA will not support a civil cause of action for personal injuries to an employee or a subcontractor.” Therefore, it cannot be the basis of criminal liability.
Wendland v. ADOBEAIR, INC. 221 P.3d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Wendland v. ADOBEAIR, INC. 221 P.3d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
AdobeAir further argued that Arizona law explicitly prevents admission of OSHA standards as evidence of negligent conduct, citing Pruett v. Precision Plumbing, Inc.
Vega v. Griffiths Construction, Inc. 833 P.2d 717 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Lewis v. N.J. Riebe Enterprises, Inc. 825 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1992
Lewis v. N.J. Riebe Enterprises, Inc. 825 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1992
Partnership, , Pruett v. *389 Precision Plumbing, Inc., , Chesin Constr.
Maders v. Estes Co. 820 P.2d 322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Maders v. Estes Co. 820 P.2d 322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
As the court stated in Pruett v. Precision Plumbing, Inc., , : [T]o permit recovery by employees of subcontractors from general contractors and owners who merely retain the right to control only the end result of the work, and perform their common law duty to keep the premises safe for invitees would circumvent and frustrate the purposes of the Arizona Work
Lewis v. N.J. Riebe Enterprises, Inc. 823 P.2d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Lewis v. N.J. Riebe Enterprises, Inc. 823 P.2d 74 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Pruett v. Precision Plumbing, Inc., , Restatement (Second) of Torts § 409 (1965).
Rashley v. Wilcox 772 P.2d 1174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Rashley v. Wilcox 772 P.2d 1174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
559 , Pruett v. Precision Plumbing, Inc., , Hall v. Moveable Offshore, Inc., 455 F.2d 633 (5th Cir.1972).
Durnin v. Karber Air Conditioning Co. 778 P.2d 1312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Durnin v. Karber Air Conditioning Co. 778 P.2d 1312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
See also Pruett v. Precision Plumbing, Inc., , Fluor Corp. v. Sykes, 3 Ariz.App.
Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co. 652 P.2d 507 Ariz. 1982
Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co. 652 P.2d 507 Ariz. 1982
APS then claims that the court erred in refusing its instruction No. 99, which postulated that APS would not be liable “to members of the public” if the condition which caused the injury was “known or obvious to such persons.” , and Citizens Utility v. Livingston, 21 Ariz.App.
Rodemich v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 637 P.2d 748 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Rodemich v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 637 P.2d 748 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Mason v. Arizona Public Service Co. 622 P.2d 493 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Mason v. Arizona Public Service Co. 622 P.2d 493 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
See Pruett v. Precision Plumbing, Inc.
Sullins v. Third & Catalina Construction Partnership 602 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Sullins v. Third & Catalina Construction Partnership 602 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
This Court held in Pruett v. Precision Plumbing, Inc., , that the express words of the statute indicate that it will not support a cause of action for personal injuries *118 by an employee of a subcontractor against the employer of the subcontractor.
Silvas v. Speros Construction Co. 594 P.2d 1029 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Silvas v. Speros Construction Co. 594 P.2d 1029 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
559 , Pruett v. Precision Plumbing, Inc., , Hall v. Moveable Offshore, Inc., 455 F.2d 633 (5th Cir. 1972).