Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite General Cable Corp. v. Citizens Utilities Co., 555 P.2d 350.

28 citing documents.

Sandoval v. Oxford Financial Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sandoval v. Oxford Financial Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
First, Sandoval contends that there is no successful party because neither party prevailed on the merits, as support.
Arik v. Rgo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Arik v. Rgo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶37 P.2d 350 (1976), P.2d 340 (1973), and Ocean West Contractors, P.2d 1102 (1979), RGO asserts the trial court should have applied a “no judgment rule” or the “net judgment rule,” which, as described in Trollope, permits a
MacGruder v. Acc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
MacGruder v. Acc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Co., Magruder, however, presented no evidence to suggest all EPCOR customers are similarly situated.
Johnson v. Swing Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Johnson v. Swing Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 1; (“We agree with the trial court that the construction and interpretation to be given to legal rights under a contract reside solely with the courts .
Kaman Aerospace Corp. v. Arizona Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Kaman Aerospace Corp. v. Arizona Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
(“Under the facts of this case, where a complaint seeks greater 12 Kaman’s complaint alleged specific damages of approximately $5.9 million as well as damages to be determined at trial.
Paloma Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Jenkins 978 P.2d 110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Paloma Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Jenkins 978 P.2d 110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Co., , (affirming trial court’s denial of both parties award of costs where claim and counterclaim had been dismissed).
Canon Sch. Dist. v. WES CONSTR. CO. IV 882 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1994
Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co. 882 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1994
Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co. 882 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1994
Co., , (holding that where complaint seeks greater damages than counterclaim and court denied relief to both parties, there is no successful party).
Canon Sch. Dist. v. WES CONSTR. CO. IV 882 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1994
Co., , (holding that where complaint seeks greater damages than counterclaim and court denied relief to both parties, there is no successful party).
Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc. v. Camelback Office Park 751 P.2d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc. v. Camelback Office Park 751 P.2d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
where both the claim and counterclaim were dismissed, the defendant argued it was the prevailing party because it had not sought as much relief in its counterclaim as the plaintiff had sought in its complaint.
J.W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. v. Arizona State Registrar of Contractors 690 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
J.W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. v. Arizona State Registrar of Contractors 690 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Camelot relies on the decisions in Trico Electric Cooperative
American Cable Television, Inc. v. Arizona Public Service Co. 693 P.2d 928 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
American Cable Television, Inc. v. Arizona Public Service Co. 693 P.2d 928 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Co., , (holding that the Commission was precluded from reviewing the reasonableness of price terms in a sale of electrical power).
Nataros v. Fine Arts Gallery of Scottsdale, Inc. 612 P.2d 500 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Nataros v. Fine Arts Gallery of Scottsdale, Inc. 612 P.2d 500 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Campbell v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. 586 P.2d 987 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Campbell v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. 586 P.2d 987 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
General Cable Corp. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 555 P.2d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
General Cable Corp. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 555 P.2d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
That action is the subject of this court’s consolidated opinion filed this date in General Cable Corp. v. Citizens Utilities Co., , .