Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Heritage Heights Home Owners Ass'n v. Esser, 565 P.2d 207.

32 citing documents.

Anthem Parkside v. Chabrowski Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Anthem Parkside v. Chabrowski Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Heritage Heights Home Owners Ass’n v. Esser
Little Wing Ranch v. Carroll Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Little Wing Ranch v. Carroll Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
see also Heritage Heights Home Owners Ass’n v. Esser, –34 (App. 1977) (“Having found the restriction valid and having required its enforcement, the trial court was obliged by the contract to assess attorneys’ fees and costs in favor of the enforcing party.”).
Comanche v. Pollard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Comanche v. Pollard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Heritage Heights Home Owners Ass’n v. Esser, (citations omitted).
Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand Haddock 330 P.3d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand Haddock 330 P.3d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Ass’n v. Simons, quoting Heritage Heights Home Owners Ass’n v. Esser, (second alteration in McDowell Mountain Ranch Cmty.
A. Miner Contracting, Inc. v. Toho-Tolani County Improvement District 311 P.3d 1062 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
A. Miner Contracting, Inc. v. Toho-Tolani County Improvement District 311 P.3d 1062 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
g out of the agreement shall be entitled to an award of its reasonable attorneys’ fees, expenses, expert witness expenses and legal costs.” When a contract includes an attorneys’ fees provision, fees are awarded “in accordance with the terms of the contract” and the trial court “lacks discretion to refuse to award fees under the contractual provision.” Heritage Heights Home Owners Ass’n v. Esser
Dreamland Villa Community Club, Inc. v. Raimey 226 P.3d 411 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Dreamland Villa Community Club, Inc. v. Raimey 226 P.3d 411 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Co., Inc., , (noting that, by purchasing property within the subdivision, lot owners became bound by the restrictions in the subdivision’s declaration); Heritage Heights Home Owners Ass’n v. Esser, , (explaining that assent to deed restrictions is equivalent to executing an instrument containing the restrictions).
MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN RANCH COMMUNITY ASS'N v. Simons 165 P.3d 667 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN RANCH COMMUNITY ASS'N v. Simons 165 P.3d 667 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Indeed, it is well-settled in Arizona that “[c]ontracts for payment of attorneys’ fees are enforced in accordance with the terms of the contract.” Heritage Heights Home Owners Ass’n v. Esser, , (quoting 25 C.J.S.
Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Ass'n v. Turner 2 P.3d 1276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Ass'n v. Turner 2 P.3d 1276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
¶ 9 “An injunction is an equitable remedy which allows the court to structure the remedy so as to promote equity between the parties.” , (supplemental opinion); see also Heritage Heights Home Owners Ass’n v. Esser
Chase Bank of Arizona v. Acosta 880 P.2d 1109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Chase Bank of Arizona v. Acosta 880 P.2d 1109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
& Loan Ass’n v. Ram, , Heritage Heights Home Owners Ass’n v. Esser, -34 , -11 (App.1977).
Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co. 733 P.2d 652 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Distinguished Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co. 733 P.2d 652 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
In the present case, the contract provision is unilateral, in that it provides for Mardian’s recovery of attorneys’ fees, rather than providing fees to “the successful or prevailing party.” Heritage Heights Home Owners Ass’n v. Esser, , is also distinguishable from the case before us. While Heritage Heights involved a unilateral attorneys’ fees provision, the court did not address the issue of the other party’s right to a statutory recovery of attorneys’ fees, because that case was appealed to o
Lacer v. Navajo County 687 P.2d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Lacer v. Navajo County 687 P.2d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Pinetop Lakes Ass'n v. Hatch 659 P.2d 1341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Pinetop Lakes Ass'n v. Hatch 659 P.2d 1341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Heritage Heights Home Owners Ass’n v. Esser
FIRST FED. S. & L. ASS'N OF PHOENIX v. Ram 659 P.2d 1323 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
FIRST FED. S. & L. ASS'N OF PHOENIX v. Ram 659 P.2d 1323 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Dalton v. McLaughlin 635 P.2d 863 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Dalton v. McLaughlin 635 P.2d 863 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Duffy v. Sunburst Farms East Mutual Water & Agricultural Co. 604 P.2d 1124 Ariz. 1979
Duffy v. Sunburst Farms East Mutual Water & Agricultural Co. 604 P.2d 1124 Ariz. 1979
Duffy v. Sunburst Farms East Mutual Water & Agricultural Co. 604 P.2d 1136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Duffy v. Sunburst Farms East Mutual Water & Agricultural Co. 604 P.2d 1136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Heritage Heights Home Owners Ass’n v. Esser

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by