Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite National Housing Industries, Inc. v. E. L. Jones Development Co., 576 P.2d 1374.

44 citing documents.

Cenite v. Carter Burgess Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Cenite v. Carter Burgess Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Co., Rev. Ariz. Jury Instr.
Valenzuela v. West Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Valenzuela v. West Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
MidFirst Bank v. Chase 284 P.3d 877 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
MidFirst Bank v. Chase 284 P.3d 877 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund 38 P.3d 12 Ariz. 2002
Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund 38 P.3d 12 Ariz. 2002
Co., , (citing 37 Am.Jur.
Wells Fargo Bank v. Az Laborers Ariz. 2002
Wells Fargo Bank v. Az Laborers Ariz. 2002
S Development Co. v. Pima Capital Management Co. 31 P.3d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Distinguished S Development Co. v. Pima Capital Management Co. 31 P.3d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Jones Development Co., , are also distinguishable.
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Western Technologies, Inc. 877 P.2d 294 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Western Technologies, Inc. 877 P.2d 294 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Co., , (essential element of professional malpractice is plaintiffs damage resulting from defendant’s conduct below the applicable standard of care; expert testimony is usually necessary to establish the standard of care).
Ulibarri v. Gerstenberger 871 P.2d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Ulibarri v. Gerstenberger 871 P.2d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Co., , (witness not shown to be expert; proper foundation not laid for expert testimony).
Easter v. Percy 810 P.2d 1053 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Easter v. Percy 810 P.2d 1053 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
GM Development Corp. v. Community American Mortgage Corp. 795 P.2d 827 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
GM Development Corp. v. Community American Mortgage Corp. 795 P.2d 827 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Jones Development Company
Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp. 748 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp. 748 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Jones Development Co., , involves the liability of a professional engineer to the assignee of its client, a developer____ They do involve, instead, the liability of professionals who generally work in close relationship with their clients or patients.
Hill v. Jones 725 P.2d 1115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Hill v. Jones 725 P.2d 1115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Rossell v. Volkswagen of America 709 P.2d 517 Ariz. 1985
Rossell v. Volkswagen of America 709 P.2d 517 Ariz. 1985
Jones Development Co., , involves the liability of a professional engineer to the assignee of its client, a developer.
Johnson v. University Hospital 712 P.2d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Johnson v. University Hospital 712 P.2d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. 1984
Donnelly Construction Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/Gilleland 677 P.2d 1292 Ariz. 1984
Brown Wholesale Electric Co. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 659 P.2d 1299 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Brown Wholesale Electric Co. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America 659 P.2d 1299 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Frazier v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'n 653 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Frazier v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'n 653 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Jones Development Co., , give us some guidance in this area.
Echols v. Beauty Built Homes, Inc. 647 P.2d 629 Ariz. 1982
Echols v. Beauty Built Homes, Inc. 647 P.2d 629 Ariz. 1982
National Housing Industries, , Rule 56(e), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S.
Angle v. Marco Builders, Inc. 626 P.2d 126 Ariz. 1981
Angle v. Marco Builders, Inc. 626 P.2d 126 Ariz. 1981
the defendant engineers contended and established through competent testimony that the “normally provided” service for which the plaintiff had contracted did not include cut-and-fill estimates as a matter of course.
Universal Investment Co. v. Sahara Motor Inn, Inc. 619 P.2d 485 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Universal Investment Co. v. Sahara Motor Inn, Inc. 619 P.2d 485 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
National Housing Industries
Scopellite v. Needham 596 P.2d 41 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Scopellite v. Needham 596 P.2d 41 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
National Housing Industries