Cited by

Bottling Co., (appellant’s timely appeal from a final judgment of the trial court “properly placed before [this court] the propriety of all prior non-appealable orders.”).

(holding that a timely appeal from a final judgment allows the appellate court to consider all prior non-appealable orders).

(timely appeal from final judgment “properly placed before us the propriety of all prior non- appealable orders”); see also A.R.S.

(§ 12-2102 proper basis for court of appeals’ review).

(concluding that a timely appeal from a final judgment may "properly placet ] before [this Court] the propriety of all prior nonappealable orders”).

(concluding that a timely appeal from a final judgment may “properly placet ] before [this court] the propriety of all prior non-appealable orders” (citation omitted)).

-69, -98 (App. 1978), none has precisely addressed how a landlord’s exercise of such an option affects a tenant’s right to compensation.

Bottling Co., , (noting that appellant’s timely appeal from a final judgment of the trial court "properly placed before [this court] the propriety of all prior non-appealable orders”).

P.2d 994 (App. 1978); Empress Beauty Supply, P.2d 350 (App. 1977).

The discovery order is an order “involving the merits of the action and necessarily affecting the judgment.” Thus, this court has jurisdiction to review the trial court’s ruling on discovery Weller, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., , Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co. v. Romley, 118 *

in which this court considered issues involved in a “condemnation” clause dispute.