Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Cheatham v. Sahuaro Collection Service, Inc., 577 P.2d 738.

26 citing documents.

Ncsl v. Milic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Ncsl v. Milic Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶19 The partial payment language in Mertola echoes this court’s finding in Cheatham v. Sahuaro Collection Serv., Inc.
Rcbt v. Cit Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Rcbt v. Cit Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
See Cheatham v. Sahuaro Collection Serv., Inc., (“In the case of a promissory note, the cause of action accrues and the statute of limitations begins to run when the debt becomes due.”); Burney v. Citigroup Glob.
PNL Asset Management Co. v. Brenden & Taylor Partnership 970 P.2d 958 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
PNL Asset Management Co. v. Brenden & Taylor Partnership 970 P.2d 958 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
See Graves v. Sawyer, 588 S.W.2d 542, 543-44 (Tenn.1979)(making a voluntary, unconditional payment on a debt, or interest due on a debt, implies a willingness to pay); Cheatham v. Sahuaro Collection Service, Inc., , 455 n. 1, , 741 n. 1 (App.1978).
Navy Federal Credit Union v. Jones 930 P.2d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Navy Federal Credit Union v. Jones 930 P.2d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Jones is partly correct because, as we observed in Cheatham v. Sahuaro Collection Serv., Inc., , “[a] cause of action accrues whenever one person may sue another.” Although Cheatham involved an installment note, it did not address the precise issue raised here of when a cause of action accrues on a defaulted installment of an unmatured note.
Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 898 P.2d 964 Ariz. 1995
Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 898 P.2d 964 Ariz. 1995
See, e.g., Beaudry Motor Co. v. New Pueblo Constructors, Inc., -83, -15 (App.1981) (breach of contract occurred and claim accrued when contractor abandoned repair of a leaking roof); Cheatham v. Sahuaro Collection Serv., Inc., (breach of contract occurred and claim accrued when debtor failed to pay on the date specified in a promissory note).
Adams Insulation Co. v. Los Portales Associates Ltd. Partnership 804 P.2d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Adams Insulation Co. v. Los Portales Associates Ltd. Partnership 804 P.2d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Healey v. Coury 783 P.2d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Healey v. Coury 783 P.2d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Because the company’s performance of its contract obligations was dependent upon the RV park making a profit or being sold, this case falls within the general rule that “a cause of action accrues whenever one person may sue another.” , 169, , 721 (App. 1985); Cheatham v. Sahuaro Collection Service, Inc.
Matter of Estate of Musgrove 696 P.2d 720 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Matter of Estate of Musgrove 696 P.2d 720 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Cheatham v. Sahuaro Collection Service, Inc., , Rogers v. Smith Kline & French Laboratories, 5 * P.2d 4 (1967).
Wheel Estate Corp. v. Webb 679 P.2d 529 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Wheel Estate Corp. v. Webb 679 P.2d 529 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
cf. Cheatham v. Sahuaro Collection Service, Inc.
Amfac Distribution Corp. v. Miller 673 P.2d 792 Ariz. 1983
Amfac Distribution Corp. v. Miller 673 P.2d 792 Ariz. 1983
Cheatham v. Sahuaro Collection Service, Inc., , , ” Miller asserts that agents of Amfac knew or should have known of his alleged negligence at the time of the trial or at the time the judgment was entered.
Nelson v. Nelson 669 P.2d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Nelson v. Nelson 669 P.2d 990 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
See Cheatham v. Sahuaro Collection Service, Inc., , Irwin v. Pacific Am.
De Anza Land and Leisure Corp. v. Raineri 669 P.2d 1339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
De Anza Land and Leisure Corp. v. Raineri 669 P.2d 1339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
John W. Masury & Son, 49 Ariz. at 464 , 68 P.2d at 688 ; Cheatham v. Sahuaro Collection Service, Inc.
Sato v. Van Denburgh 599 P.2d 181 Ariz. 1979
Sato v. Van Denburgh 599 P.2d 181 Ariz. 1979
Cheatham v. Sahuaro Collection Service, Inc.