Cited by

That issue turns on when the disputed property was acquired, and it proceeds “without regard to marital misconduct,” A.R.S.

Law P. 82(a), we assume the court found every fact necessary to support the judgment if factually supported

Indeed, at the end of trial (and although doing so to seek additional trial time), Mother admitted she “never addressed how much [she] contributed to the home.” ¶15 To convert sole and separate real property into community property, a written conveyance must “indicat[e] an intention that the grantee/spouse should have the property.” (citation omitted).

(addressing how to characterize an increase in value of separate property during the marriage); –92 (App. 1979) (resolving the effect of disclaimer deed on property acquired during the marriage).

¶ 10 (App. 2020), ¶¶ 18–19 (2022).

From there, we affirm the decree “if there is reasonable evidence to support such [findings].”

at 523–24, ¶¶ 7–11; –93 (App. 1979).

(quoting Musker v. Gil Haskins Auto Leasing, Inc., ).

(holding that spouses may convey their separate or community interests to each other by written agreement coupled with contemporaneous conduct showing intent to convey).

Law P. 82(a)(1) (requiring the court to make express findings of fact and conclusions of law “[i]f requested before trial”)

¶15 Although Wife points to evidence that she worked for the business and that the business periodically borrowed funds from the community, “[t]he status of property in Arizona, as to whether it is community or separate property, is established at the time of its acquisition.”

¶ 11 (App. 2013) (parenting time) ( ¶ 3 (App. 2002)); (child support) ().