Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Paynter, 593 P.2d 948.

63 citing documents.

Cravens v. Montano 567 P.3d 745 Ariz. 2025
Cravens v. Montano 567 P.3d 745 Ariz. 2025
see also Leflet v. Redwood Fire & Cas.
Colorado Casualty Insurance v. Safety Control Co. 288 P.3d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Colorado Casualty Insurance v. Safety Control Co. 288 P.3d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Colorado Casualty Insurance v. Safety Control Co. 269 P.3d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Colorado Casualty Insurance v. Safety Control Co. 269 P.3d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance 236 P.3d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Desert Mountain Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance 236 P.3d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Penn-America Insurance v. Sanchez 202 P.3d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Penn-America Insurance v. Sanchez 202 P.3d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
(rejecting an insurer’s argument that a covenant not to execute in a Damron 10 agreement relieved the insurer of any obligation to pay the judgment entered against its insured, and explaining that “[w]e agree with Paynter that were we to sustain State Farm’s position in this regard
A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control District 204 P.3d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control District 204 P.3d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Stout v. State Compensation Fund 44 P.3d 178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Stout v. State Compensation Fund 44 P.3d 178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
(similar holding to Gilbreath ).
In Re Alcorn 41 P.3d 600 Ariz. 2002
In Re Alcorn 41 P.3d 600 Ariz. 2002
In the Matter of Richard Alcorn and Steven Feola Ariz. 2002
In the Matter of Richard Alcorn and Steven Feola Ariz. 2002
v. Paynter, P.2d 948 (App. 1979).
Cunningham v. Goettl Air Conditioning, Inc. 980 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Cunningham v. Goettl Air Conditioning, Inc. 980 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
-01 , 593 *-51 (App.1979).
Hmielewski v. Maricopa County 960 P.2d 47 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Hmielewski v. Maricopa County 960 P.2d 47 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Hmielewski argues that because only one defendant remained at trial, the pretrial agreement did not have to be disclosed to the court.
Monthofer Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Allen 943 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Monthofer Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Allen 943 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Admin. Risk Mgt. v. Univ. Physicians 895 P.2d 1025 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Admin. Risk Mgt. v. Univ. Physicians 895 P.2d 1025 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Rogan v. Auto-Owners Insurance 832 P.2d 212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Rogan v. Auto-Owners Insurance 832 P.2d 212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Samson v. Transamerica Ins.
Brownsdale Cooperative Ass'n v. Home Insurance Co. 473 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Peaton 812 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Peaton 812 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
A. WINDT, supra §§ 3.10 to 3.11, at 97-99.
St. Michel v. Burns and Wilcox, Ltd. 433 N.W.2d 130 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Porter v. Continental Casualty Co. 753 P.2d 178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Porter v. Continental Casualty Co. 753 P.2d 178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
He Porter’s final contention is that since “dependents” is not defined either in the master policy or in the Social Security Act, the word is ambiguous and must be construed against Continental pursuant to Sparks, supra; , and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. O’Brien, 24 Ariz.App.
United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Morris 741 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1987
United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Morris 741 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1987
See Helme, supra (anticipatory repudiation of duty to indemnify); , (breach of duty to defend); , (same).
Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Helme 735 P.2d 451 Ariz. 1987
Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Helme 735 P.2d 451 Ariz. 1987
A. WINDT, supra §§ 3.10 to 3.11, at 97-99.
Canadian Indemnity Co. v. Heflin 727 P.2d 35 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Canadian Indemnity Co. v. Heflin 727 P.2d 35 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
McCollum v. Continental Casualty Co. 728 P.2d 1242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
McCollum v. Continental Casualty Co. 728 P.2d 1242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Linthicum v. Nationwide Life Insurance 723 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Linthicum v. Nationwide Life Insurance 723 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State Farm Automobile Ins.
Roberts v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 705 P.2d 1335 Ariz. 1985
Roberts v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 705 P.2d 1335 Ariz. 1985
(ambiguity in policy construed against insurer).
Roberts v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 705 P.2d 1352 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
American National Fire Insurance v. Esquire Labs of Arizona, Inc. 694 P.2d 800 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
American National Fire Insurance v. Esquire Labs of Arizona, Inc. 694 P.2d 800 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Gray v. Zurich Insurance Company, 65 Cal.2d 263 , 54 Cal.Rptr.
Gilbreath v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 685 P.2d 729 Ariz. 1984