Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Continental Bank v. Wa-Ho Truck Brokerage, 595 P.2d 206.

28 citing documents.

Iftiger v. Weston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Iftiger v. Weston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See Cont’l (finding failure by a party to request to be relieved of its admissions binds the party to the admission on appeal).
Estrada v. Figari Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Estrada v. Figari Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See Cont’l (“The Bank having failed to request the trial court to be relieved of this admission, is bound by the admission on appeal.”).
Krieger v. Duick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Krieger v. Duick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Dessarollo Immobiliario Y Negocios Industriales De Alta Tecnologia De Hermosillo v. Kader Holdings Company Limited Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Dessarollo Immobiliario Y Negocios Industriales De Alta Tecnologia De Hermosillo v. Kader Holdings Company Limited Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
By failing to assert it at that time, Kader waived the argument and should have been foreclosed from reopening the issue later.13 Cf. Cont’l (commercial reasonableness defense not waived when raised at summary judgment).
Mohave Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Byers 942 P.2d 451 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Mohave Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Byers 942 P.2d 451 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
(An expert’s affidavits at least raised an issue of fact concerning commercial reasonableness to require a full trial.).
Maricopa Turf, Inc. v. Sunmaster, Inc. 842 P.2d 1370 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Maricopa Turf, Inc. v. Sunmaster, Inc. 842 P.2d 1370 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Menendez v. Paddock Pool Construction Co. 836 P.2d 968 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Menendez v. Paddock Pool Construction Co. 836 P.2d 968 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Ayres v. Red Cloud Mills, Ltd. 808 P.2d 1226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Ayres v. Red Cloud Mills, Ltd. 808 P.2d 1226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Schoenfelder v. Arizona Bank 796 P.2d 881 Ariz. 1990
Schoenfelder v. Arizona Bank 796 P.2d 881 Ariz. 1990
City of Phoenix v. Great Western Bank & Trust 712 P.2d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
City of Phoenix v. Great Western Bank & Trust 712 P.2d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Thompson 707 P.2d 956 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Thompson 707 P.2d 956 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
On cross-examination he emphasized that child abuse “was the number one diagnosis that we had in our mind [sic] as we left the emergency room that day.” Unlike a lay witness, an expert witness is allowed to testify to facts or data not admissible in evidence, , if such supportive factual material is of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the formation of an opinion.
Cook v. Great Western Bank & Trust 685 P.2d 145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Cook v. Great Western Bank & Trust 685 P.2d 145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Hernandez v. Faker 671 P.2d 427 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Hernandez v. Faker 671 P.2d 427 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
A third Arizona opinion which may, at first
Ickes v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc. 650 P.2d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Ickes v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc. 650 P.2d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
we assume, without deciding, that the defense based on this subsection is available to Bache under the facts of this case.