Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Massengill v. Superior Court, 416 P.2d 1009.

36 citing documents.

Lay v. Hon. nelson/state 436 P.3d 496 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lay v. Hon. nelson/state 436 P.3d 496 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Amparano v. Asarco, Inc. 93 P.3d 1086 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Amparano v. Asarco, Inc. 93 P.3d 1086 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
this court discussed an analogous situation of competing venue exceptions.
TWE Retirement Fund Trust v. Ream 8 P.3d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
TWE Retirement Fund Trust v. Ream 8 P.3d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
(filing an action in the wrong county is not a fatal jurisdictional defect but is a venue problem that must be raised in a timely manner).
Morgan v. Foreman 973 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Morgan v. Foreman 973 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State v. Flemming 907 P.2d 496 Ariz. 1995
State v. Flemming 907 P.2d 496 Ariz. 1995
The court reasoned that because “[t]here is but one superior court in the state of Arizona,” Flemming, 182 Ariz. at 241 , 895 P.2d at 1004 ( , ), the automatic violation provision of Rule 27.7(e) applies whenever a superior court probationer in Arizona is determined to be guilty of a new offense anywhere in an Arizona superior court.
State v. Flemming 895 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Flemming 895 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
This Court has said that “[t]here is but one Superior Court in the State of Arizona.” , see also Ariz. Const, art. VI, § 1.
Lakritz v. Superior Court 880 P.2d 1144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Lakritz v. Superior Court 880 P.2d 1144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Cacho v. Superior Court 821 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1991
Cacho v. Superior Court 821 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1991
Zuckernick v. Roylston 684 P.2d 177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Zuckernick v. Roylston 684 P.2d 177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Yuma County v. Keddie 647 P.2d 1150 Ariz. 1982
Yuma County v. Keddie 647 P.2d 1150 Ariz. 1982
Jackson v. Superior Court 533 P.2d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
Jackson v. Superior Court 533 P.2d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
Wallen v. Jacobson 504 P.2d 499 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Wallen v. Jacobson 504 P.2d 499 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
GAC Properties, , , Sherrill v. Superior Court, supra.
Yell v. Garrett 504 P.2d 544 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Yell v. Garrett 504 P.2d 544 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Shields v. Shields, 115 Mont.
Sherrill v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMA 493 P.2d 1230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Sherrill v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMA 493 P.2d 1230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Anonymous v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF PIMA 484 P.2d 655 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Anonymous v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF PIMA 484 P.2d 655 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Ray v. Sommer 481 P.2d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Ray v. Sommer 481 P.2d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
GAC Properties, Inc. of Arizona v. Farley 481 P.2d 526 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
GAC Properties, Inc. of Arizona v. Farley 481 P.2d 526 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Albins v. Superior Court, 7 Ariz.App.
Albins v. SUPERIOR CT. IN & FOR YAVAPAI CTY. 438 P.2d 333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
Albins v. SUPERIOR CT. IN & FOR YAVAPAI CTY. 438 P.2d 333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
this Court stated on page 591 of the Arizona Appeals Reports, 416 P.2d on page 1012: “ * * * when a proper request for a change of venue has been made, the cause must be transferred.