Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Continental Life & Accident Co. v. Songer, 603 P.2d 921.

33 citing documents.

Grunwald v. Scottsdale Healthcare Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Grunwald v. Scottsdale Healthcare Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
McKee v. State 388 P.3d 14 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
McKee v. State 388 P.3d 14 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Link v. Pima County 972 P.2d 669 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Link v. Pima County 972 P.2d 669 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
(erroneous instruction followed by general verdict requires reversal, although jury might have decided issue on other grounds).
Napier v. Bertram 937 P.2d 332 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Napier v. Bertram 937 P.2d 332 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
(insurer is under a duty to act upon insurance application within a reasonable period of time and the violation of this duty subjects the insurer to liability for negligence).
Miel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 912 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Miel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 912 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
for the proposition that an insurer’s mishandling of a claim can give rise to an independent cause of action for negligence.
Hill v. Chubb Life American Insurance 894 P.2d 701 Ariz. 1995
Hill v. Chubb Life American Insurance 894 P.2d 701 Ariz. 1995
P.2d 921 (App.1979), it is arguably understandable that Hill’s complaint focused on tort liability.
Hill v. Chubb Life American Insurance 870 P.2d 1133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Hill v. Chubb Life American Insurance 870 P.2d 1133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Both parties rely upon the case of Continental Life & , in which this court, for the first time, recognized the tort theory of liability for “negligent delay” by an insurance company in the processing of an application.
Services Holding Co. v. Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance 883 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Services Holding Co. v. Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance 883 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
as authority for its argument.
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. 861 P.2d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. 861 P.2d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Ford v. Revlon, Inc. 734 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1987
Ford v. Revlon, Inc. 734 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1987
accord Stewart v. Thomas, 538 F.Supp.
Heltzel v. Mecham Pontiac 730 P.2d 226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Heltzel v. Mecham Pontiac 730 P.2d 226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Rawlings v. Apodaca 726 P.2d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Rawlings v. Apodaca 726 P.2d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
18 A.L.R.4th 1099 (App.1979) as a case in which the court refused to limit the insurer’s duty to the payment of claims under the contract.
Creamer v. Raffety 699 P.2d 908 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Creamer v. Raffety 699 P.2d 908 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
conduct,” Continental Life & , we set aside the directed verdict in favor of appellees Raffety and Morris on the § 1983 cruel and unusual punishment claim.
Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Zumstein 675 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. Zumstein 675 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Statewide Insurance v. Dewar 694 P.2d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Cain v. Aetna Life Insurance 659 P.2d 1334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Cain v. Aetna Life Insurance 659 P.2d 1334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Co., , (bad faith refusal to pay claim); , (duty to act upon application for insurance within reasonable period of time).
Maldonado v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 629 P.2d 1001 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Maldonado v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 629 P.2d 1001 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981