Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Webster v. State of Arizona Board of Regents, 599 P.2d 816.
-
Ontiveros v. Arizona Department of Transportation
729 P.2d 346
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Even when “two inconsistent factual conclusions could be supported by the record, then there is substantial evidence to support an administrative decision that elects either conclusion.” -66 , -19 (App.1979).
- Maricopa County v. Gottsponer 723 P.2d 716 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Maricopa County v. Gottsponer 723 P.2d 716 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Smith v. Arizona Department of Transportation 706 P.2d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- Smith v. Arizona Department of Transportation 706 P.2d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- Anamax Mining Co. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 711 P.2d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Anamax Mining Co. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 711 P.2d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- DeGroot v. Arizona Racing Commission 686 P.2d 1301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
-
DeGroot v. Arizona Racing Commission
686 P.2d 1301
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
: “The trial judge may not merely substitute his judgment for that of the administrative agency involved.
- Howard v. Nicholls 621 P.2d 292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- Howard v. Nicholls 621 P.2d 292 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980