Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Marriage of Bugh v. Bugh, 608 P.2d 329.

97 citing documents.

Greenham v. Hope Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Greenham v. Hope Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
McCammon v. Olson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
McCammon v. Olson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(“Although we may regard [the] failure to respond as a confession of reversible error, we are not required to do so.”) ( ).
State v. Saleem Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Saleem Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
("Where debatable issues are raised, the failure of an appellee to file an answering brief constitutes a confession of reversible error.").
Helland v. Helland 337 P.3d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Helland v. Helland 337 P.3d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
5 HELLAND v. HELLAND Opinion of the Court ¶14 a decision in which we determined that worker’s compensation benefits paid after dissolution are the worker’s separate property.
Summers Group, Inc. v. Tempe Mechanical, LLC 299 P.3d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Summers Group, Inc. v. Tempe Mechanical, LLC 299 P.3d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Davies v. Beres 233 P.3d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Davies v. Beres 233 P.3d 1139 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Braillard v. Maricopa County, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Braillard v. Maricopa County, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Gersten v. Gersten 219 P.3d 309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Gersten v. Gersten 219 P.3d 309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
¶ 18 The family court ruled that Husband’s FECA income was community property during the marriage, relying on this court’s , that state workers’ compensation benefits compensate a claimant for loss of earning capacity, a community asset.
In Re the Marriage of Diezsi 38 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
In Re the Marriage of Diezsi 38 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Aranda v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 11 P.3d 1006 Ariz. 2000
Aranda v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 11 P.3d 1006 Ariz. 2000
See Madrid v. Industrial Comm’n, , United Riggers Erectors v. Industrial Comm’n, , ( , ).
Schritter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 4 P.3d 466 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Schritter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 4 P.3d 466 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Gibbons v. Industrial Commission 3 P.3d 1028 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Gibbons v. Industrial Commission 3 P.3d 1028 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Evertsen, 117 Ariz. at 383, 573 P.2d at 74 .
Aranda v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 989 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Aranda v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 989 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Hall v. World Savings & Loan Ass'n 943 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Hall v. World Savings & Loan Ass'n 943 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Reversal is not mandatory, , however, and because this is purely an issue of law and affects the remanded proceedings, we address it on the merits.
Hatcher v. Hatcher 933 P.2d 1222 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Hatcher v. Hatcher 933 P.2d 1222 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Marriage of Ward v. Ward 453 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Greenlee County Justice Court 756 P.2d 939 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State v. Greenlee County Justice Court 756 P.2d 939 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
In Re the Marriage of Cupp 730 P.2d 870 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
In Re the Marriage of Cupp 730 P.2d 870 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
More recently, , this court held that workers’ compensation benefits paid after the dissolution of a marriage for injuries suffered during the marriage are the separate property of the spouse receiving the award.
Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial Commission 720 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1986
Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial Commission 720 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1986
Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial Commission 720 P.2d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Dancing Sunshines Lounge v. Industrial Commission 720 P.2d 85 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Haynes v. Haynes 713 P.2d 1249 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Haynes v. Haynes 713 P.2d 1249 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
interpreting an anti-assignment statute under the workman’s compensation law, evidenced a legislative intent that liability benefits are not assignable to a non-injured spouse upon dissolution of the marriage.
Gonzales v. Gonzales 657 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Gonzales v. Gonzales 657 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior Court 641 P.2d 1275 Ariz. 1982
Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior Court 641 P.2d 1275 Ariz. 1982
Sorenson v. Six Companies, Inc.
United Riggers Erectors v. Industrial Commission 640 P.2d 189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
United Riggers Erectors v. Industrial Commission 640 P.2d 189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by