Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Sweis v. Chatwin, 585 P.2d 269.

44 citing documents.

American Power Products, Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc. 396 P.3d 600 Ariz. 2017
American Power Products, Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc. 396 P.3d 600 Ariz. 2017
[when] *368 the parties have provided in their contract the conditions under which attorney’s fees may be recovered,” , see also Geller v. Lesk, 230 Ariz, 624, 627 ¶ 9, (stating that parties’ contractual attorney fee provision, “not the statute,” governs an award of fees); , 418 n.2, , 1242 n.2 (App. 1995) (stating that “when
Thiele v. City of Phoenix 301 P.3d 206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Thiele v. City of Phoenix 301 P.3d 206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
-54 , -74 (App.1978) (holding a trial court erroneously considered attorneys’ fees in imposing a $20,000 costs bond).
Geller v. Lesk 285 P.3d 972 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Geller v. Lesk 285 P.3d 972 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
§ 12-341.01(A) (“This section shall in no manner be construed as altering, prohibiting or restricting present or future contracts or statutes that may provide for attorney fees.”); Connor v. Cal-Az Props., Inc., , 55 (fee-shifting statute inapplicable given that parties contractually provided for attorneys’ fees) ( , ); , (“Sweis v. Chatwin did not hold that any express contractual provision for attorney’s fees, however worded, ‘preempts’ A.R.S.
MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN RANCH COMMUNITY ASS'N v. Simons 165 P.3d 667 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN RANCH COMMUNITY ASS'N v. Simons 165 P.3d 667 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
§ 12-341.0KA) (2003) (“This section shall in no manner be construed as altering, prohibiting or restricting present or future contracts or statutes that may provide for attorney fees.”); , (“[I]t is our opinion that [A.R.S.
Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Ass'n v. Bach 973 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1999
Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Ass'n v. Bach 973 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1999
( , and Stewart v. Lee-Stewart, Inc., 5 Ariz.App.
Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Ass'n v. Bach 952 P.2d 325 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Ass'n v. Bach 952 P.2d 325 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
“Unless provided for by statute, expenditures made by the parties in civil proceedings are not recoverable as costs.”
Lisa v. Strom 904 P.2d 1239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Lisa v. Strom 904 P.2d 1239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Jordan v. Burgbacher 883 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Jordan v. Burgbacher 883 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Chase Bank of Arizona v. Acosta 880 P.2d 1109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Chase Bank of Arizona v. Acosta 880 P.2d 1109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Chandler Medical Building Partners v. Chandler Dental Group 855 P.2d 787 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Chandler Medical Building Partners v. Chandler Dental Group 855 P.2d 787 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Sullivan v. State Land Department 838 P.2d 1360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Sullivan v. State Land Department 838 P.2d 1360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Hunt Investment Co. v. Eliot 742 P.2d 858 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Hunt Investment Co. v. Eliot 742 P.2d 858 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
This court has stated that “[ujnless provided for by statute, expenditures made by parties in civil proceedings are not recoverable as costs.” , ; Fowler v. Great American Ins.
Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc. v. Camelback Office Park 751 P.2d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc. v. Camelback Office Park 751 P.2d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
§ 12-341.01(A) by the “successful” party in a suit arising out of contract are not mandatory, this statute further provides that “[t]his section shall in no manner be construed as altering, prohibiting or restricting present or future contracts or statutes that may provide for attorney’s fees.” , we held that A.R.S.
Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co. 733 P.2d 652 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Distinguished Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co. 733 P.2d 652 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
is distinguishable from the instant case.
Lange v. Lotzer 727 P.2d 38 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Lange v. Lotzer 727 P.2d 38 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Boltz & Odegaard v. Hohn 714 P.2d 854 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Boltz & Odegaard v. Hohn 714 P.2d 854 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Cortaro Water Users' Ass'n v. Steiner 714 P.2d 836 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
CORTARO WATER USERS'ASS'N v. Steiner 714 P.2d 836 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
CORTARO WATER USERS'ASS'N v. Steiner 714 P.2d 836 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Cortaro Water Users' Ass'n v. Steiner 714 P.2d 836 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. State 696 P.2d 185 Ariz. 1985
New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. State 696 P.2d 185 Ariz. 1985
§ 12-341.01); , (attorney’s fees awarded pursuant to A.R.S.
Connor v. Cal-Az Properties, Inc. 668 P.2d 896 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Connor v. Cal-Az Properties, Inc. 668 P.2d 896 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Gulf Homes, Inc. v. DM Federal Credit Union 607 P.2d 387 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Gulf Homes, Inc. v. DM Federal Credit Union 607 P.2d 387 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
and find it inapplicable to the garnishment costs and attorney’s fees question before us. 2 .
USLIFE Title Co. v. Soule Steel Co. 593 P.2d 302 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
USLIFE Title Co. v. Soule Steel Co. 593 P.2d 302 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979