Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Kalkbrenner v. Anderson, 405 P.2d 471.

32 citing documents.

Duncan v. Progressive Preferred Ins. Co. 258 P.3d 216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Duncan v. Progressive Preferred Ins. Co. 258 P.3d 216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Matter of Estate of Killen 937 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
McCannon v. McCannon 937 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
McCannon v. McCannon 937 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Matter of Estate of Killen 937 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Grand Real Estate, Inc. v. Sirignano 676 P.2d 642 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Grand Real Estate, Inc. v. Sirignano 676 P.2d 642 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Stephens v. Textron, Inc. 619 P.2d 736 Ariz. 1980
Stephens v. Textron, Inc. 619 P.2d 736 Ariz. 1980
Matter of Estate of Stephens 574 P.2d 67 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Matter of Estate of Stephens 574 P.2d 67 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
In view of our earlier discussion of administratrices fees and our standard of review, that findings of the trial court on a question of fact may not be disturbed on appeal if there is reasonable evidence in the record to sustain them, , we will evaluate the legal principles.
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Allstate Insurance 543 P.2d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Allstate Insurance 543 P.2d 147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix 533 P.2d 73 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Costanzo v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix 533 P.2d 73 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Panagiotis v. Miltiades 497 P.2d 77 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Panagiotis v. Miltiades 497 P.2d 77 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
“This section is concerned with the costs and expenses of a will contest after probate and not with the costs and expenses incurred in a special administration.”
Hazar v. State ex rel. Swift 495 P.2d 854 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Hazar v. State ex rel. Swift 495 P.2d 854 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
In Re Estate of Shattuck 495 P.2d 873 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
In Re Estate of Shattuck 495 P.2d 873 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Valley National Bank v. Lewin 488 P.2d 671 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
In Re Estate and Guardianship of Vermeersch 488 P.2d 671 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Valley National Bank v. Lewin 488 P.2d 671 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
In Re Estate and Guardianship of Vermeersch 488 P.2d 671 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Grant v. Arizona Bank 424 P.2d 845 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Grant v. Arizona Bank 424 P.2d 845 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
B. The executor or administrator may prosecute to final judgment an action commenced by the special administrator.” (Emphasis supplied) In the Matter of the Estate of Julie H. Pitt, Deceased, , this Court stated: “ * * * It is the policy of the law to keep the administration of decedents’ estates in the hands of regularly appointed administrators and executors and to rely on special administrators only in cases of emergency and for a limited time.
MacK v. Augustine 416 P.2d 436 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
MacK v. Augustine 416 P.2d 436 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
Norvelle v. Lucas 415 P.2d 478 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Norvelle v. Lucas 415 P.2d 478 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
439 , , Hurst v. Hurst, 1 Ariz.App.