Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Food for Health Co. v. 3839 Joint Venture, 628 P.2d 986.

30 citing documents.

US Bank v. Lietz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
US Bank v. Lietz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Food for Health Co., v. 3839 Joint Venture
Shaffer v. Procaccianti Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Shaffer v. Procaccianti Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶16 Appellants have failed to prove the first requirement for issue preclusion—that the status of the HOA and the validity of the 2006 Amendment—were “actually litigated and determined by a valid and final judgment.” Food for Health Co., Inc. v. 3839 Joint Venture, (citation omitted).
US Bank v. Neminsky Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
US Bank v. Neminsky Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Co., (citation omitted); Food for Health Co., Inc. v. 3839 Joint Venture
Tri City v. Grady Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Tri City v. Grady Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Food for Health Co. v. 3839 Joint Venture
Delci v. Gutierrez Trucking Co. 275 P.3d 632 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Delci v. Gutierrez Trucking Co. 275 P.3d 632 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
DISCUSSION ¶ 6 “A motion for judgment on the pleadings for the purposes thereof admits all material allegations of the opposing party’s pleadings, and all allegations of the moving party which have been denied are taken as false so that a motion or judgment on the pleadings is only granted if the moving party is clearly entitled to judgment.” Food for Health Co., Inc. v. 3839 Joint Venture
Campbell v. SZL Properties, Ltd. 62 P.3d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Campbell v. SZL Properties, Ltd. 62 P.3d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Standage Ventures, , Food for Health Co. v. 3839 Joint Venture, -07 , -90 (App.1981).
Garcia v. General Motors Corp. 990 P.2d 1069 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Garcia v. General Motors Corp. 990 P.2d 1069 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
645 , 58 L.Ed.2d 552 (1979), with Food for Health Co., Inc. v. 3839 Joint Venture
Napier v. Bertram 937 P.2d 332 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Napier v. Bertram 937 P.2d 332 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Food for Health Co. v. 3839 Joint Venture, , (a motion for judgment on the pleadings accepts as false all of the moving party’s allegations which are denied by the opposing party).
Matter of Residence at 15453 No. 2nd Ave. 912 P.2d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State ex rel. Woods v. Sigman 912 P.2d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Matter of Residence at 15453 No. 2nd Ave. 912 P.2d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Food for Health Co. v. 3839 Joint Venture
State ex rel. Woods v. Sigman 912 P.2d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Food for Health Co. v. 3839 Joint Venture
Standage v. Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. 866 P.2d 889 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Standage v. Jaburg & Wilk, P.C. 866 P.2d 889 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Food for Health Co. v. 3839 Joint Venture, , (collateral estoppel occurs “when a party defending a claim attempts to assert a previous judgment, to which it was not a party, against an opponent who was a party to preclude relitigation of the claim”).
Boatman v. Samaritan Health Services, Inc. 812 P.2d 1025 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Boatman v. Samaritan Health Services, Inc. 812 P.2d 1025 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Food for Health Co., Inc. v. 3839 Joint Venture
Wetzel v. Arizona State Real Estate Department 727 P.2d 825 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Wetzel v. Arizona State Real Estate Department 727 P.2d 825 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Standage Ventures, , Food for Health Co., Inc. v. 3839 Joint Venture, , Spettigue v. Mahoney, 8 Ariz.App.
J.W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. v. Arizona State Registrar of Contractors 690 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
J.W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. v. Arizona State Registrar of Contractors 690 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Food for Health Co. v. 3839 Joint Venture
Forty-Four Hundred East Broadway Co. v. 4400 East Broadway 679 P.2d 521 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Forty-Four Hundred East Broadway Co. v. 4400 East Broadway 679 P.2d 521 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Assuming arguendo that Mrs. Paye was not a privy to the bankruptcy proceedings, the doctrine of collateral estoppel applies here, see Food for Health Co., Inc. v. 3839 Joint Venture, , and the Anzalone Partnership cannot relitigate these issues.