Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Lee v. Lee, 649 P.2d 997.
- REDKEY v. MCCOLLUM Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
-
REDKEY v. MCCOLLUM
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
(“The court of appeals acquires no jurisdiction to review matters not contained in the notice of appeal.”).
- Mitchell v. Martinet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Mitchell v. Martinet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Nobles v. Noce Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Nobles v. Noce
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Madisons Chevrolet, (appellee must file a cross-appeal when “seek[ing] to enlarge on appeal the relief the appellee seeks”); (“The court of appeals acquires no jurisdiction to review matters not contained in the notice of appeal.”); see also Ariz. R. Civ.
- In Re the Marriage of Duvall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
-
In Re the Marriage of Duvall
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
(court’s allocation of community debt does not affect third-party creditors but instead “fix[es] responsibility between the parties for the debt and can be used by one spouse to sue the other for contribution, if necessary”); (“The allocation of community liabilities determines the rights and obligations of parties before the court only with respect to each other.”).
- Hanger v. Hanger Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Hanger v. Hanger
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
(stating jurisdiction limited to matters specified in notice of appeal); see also ARCAP 9(a) (Notice of appeal must be filed within “30 days after entry of the judgment from which the appeal is taken[.]”).
- Brionna J. v. dcs/a.V. Ariz. 2023
-
Brionna J. v. dcs/a.V.
Ariz. 2023
§ 12-120.21(A)(1); ARCAP 8(a)–(b); (“The court of appeals acquires no jurisdiction to review matters not contained in the notice of appeal.”).
- State v. Stewart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
State v. Stewart
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
See 9 (Determining witness credibility and resolving conflicting evidence are functions for the superior court.).
- Olesen v. daniel/burge Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Olesen v. daniel/burge
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Ass’n v. Turner, ¶ 5 (App. 2000)
- Dawson v. Dawson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Decormier v. Cormier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Decormier v. Cormier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Dawson v. Dawson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
ARCAP 9(a); ¶ 5 (App. 2014) (“[T]his court only acquires jurisdiction over those matters identified in a timely filed notice of appeal.”) ().
- Kristian v. v. Dcs, A.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Kristian v. v. Dcs, A.V.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(appellate court “acquires no jurisdiction to review matters not contained in the notice of appeal”).
- Robinson v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Robinson v. Robinson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(explaining appellate court “acquires no jurisdiction to review matters not in [a] notice of appeal”; absent “a timely notice of appeal following entry of the order sought to be appealed, we are without jurisdiction to determine the propriety of the order sought to be appealed”); ARCAP 9(a).
- Scheirer v. Scheirer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Scheirer v. Scheirer
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(“The trial court’s broad discretionary powers include the power to order a sale of community property when it will facilitate the equitable division of the property.”).
- Holloway v. Goodard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Holloway v. Goodard
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(absent “timely notice of appeal following entry of the order sought to be appealed, we are without jurisdiction to determine the propriety of the order sought to be appealed”) (citations omitted).
- Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Goodard v. Goodard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Goodard v. Goodard
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
(“In the absence of a timely notice of appeal following entry of the order sought to be appealed, we are without jurisdiction to determine the propriety of the order sought to be appealed.”).
- Green v. Rhoads Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Green v. Rhoads
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 5 (App. 2014) (“[T]his court only acquires jurisdiction over those matters identified in a timely filed notice of appeal.”)
- Simone v. Thompson, IV Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Simone v. Thompson, IV Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Galvan v. Duarte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Galvan v. Duarte
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
functions of the trial court.”
- Alvares v. Munguia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Menghini v. Menghini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Menghini v. Menghini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Alvares v. Munguia
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
(describing the superior court’s “broad discretionary powers” to “facilitate the equitable division of the property” under A.R.S.
- El-Sharkawy v. El-Sharkawy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
El-Sharkawy v. El-Sharkawy
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 13 (App. 2007) (-23 (App. 1984), ).
- In re Cotter 425 P.3d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
-
In re Cotter
425 P.3d 258
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
See In re Marriage of Thorn , , ¶ 10, (appellate court lacks jurisdiction over issues raised in untimely, amended notice of appeal); Lee v. Lee , , 125, (court lacks jurisdiction to consider arguments raised after notice of appeal filed).
- Susie B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
Susie B. v. Dcs
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
designate the final order or part thereof appealed from.” Absent “a timely notice of appeal following entry of the order sought to be appealed, we are without jurisdiction to determine the propriety of the order sought to be appealed.” see also China Doll Restaurant, (court of appeals has no jurisdiction to consider an issue not contained in the notice of appeal).
- Joshua T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Joshua T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018