Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 681 P.2d 390.

214 citing documents.

Offerman v. Granada 418 P.3d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Offerman v. Granada 418 P.3d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Lexon v. Valley Springs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Lexon v. Valley Springs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Earle Investments, LLC v. Southern Desert Medical Center Partners 394 P.3d 1089 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Earle Investments, LLC v. Southern Desert Medical Center Partners 394 P.3d 1089 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Brubacher v. Propaganda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Brubacher v. Propaganda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Co. of Am., which they assert “is controlling precedent and is directly on point.” Appellants’ reliance on Prudential is misplaced.
Cabral v. Ddd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Cabral v. Ddd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Heroyan-Hamayak v. Hamayak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Heroyan-Hamayak v. Hamayak Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Zuluaga ex rel. Zuluaga v. Bashas', Inc. 394 P.3d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
Zuluaga ex rel. Zuluaga v. Bashas', Inc. 394 P.3d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
Schott v. Schott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Schott v. Schott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Co. of Am., (noting “‘no rule is better settled than that parol evidence is inadmissible to vary or control the plain and unambiguous terms of a written contract’”) (quoting Indus.
Cason v. Cason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Cason v. Cason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Co. of America, (“An owner of property has, by definition, knowledge of the components of value that are useful in ascertaining value, and an owner, no less than an ‘expert,’ can base his opinion of value on that knowledge.”); Moore v. Title Ins.
Pinnacle Peak v. Ramioulle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Pinnacle Peak v. Ramioulle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Gila River Indian Community v. Department of Child Safety 363 P.3d 148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Gila River Indian Community v. Department of Child Safety 363 P.3d 148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Great Western Bank v. LJC Development, LLC 362 P.3d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Great Western Bank v. LJC Development, LLC 362 P.3d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Crown v. Ap Wireless Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Crown v. Ap Wireless Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Roberts v. Del Webb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Roberts v. Del Webb Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Co. of Am., -59, -11 (App. 1983) (same).
Austin v. W. Surprise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Austin v. W. Surprise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Co. of Am., –79, –31 (App. 1983) (“a statement by a party to a contract that he will perform only in accordance with his own erroneous interpretation of that contract is a 7 AUSTIN et al. v. W. SURPRISE et al. Decision of t
Sullivan v. Homes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sullivan v. Homes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Vong v. Aune 328 P.3d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Vong v. Aune 328 P.3d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Southwest v. Burns Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Southwest v. Burns Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
The ESTATE OF JOSEFA U. DeCAMACHO v. LA SOLANA CARE AND REHAB, INC. 316 P.3d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
The ESTATE OF JOSEFA U. DeCAMACHO v. LA SOLANA CARE AND REHAB, INC. 316 P.3d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
A. Miner Contracting, Inc. v. Toho-Tolani County Improvement District 311 P.3d 1062 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
A. Miner Contracting, Inc. v. Toho-Tolani County Improvement District 311 P.3d 1062 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Co. of America, , (“[A]ny ambiguity in the documents is subject to a factual determination concerning the intent of the parties and is to be resolved conclusively by the trier of faet[.]”).
Ralph and Carolee Thomas v. Montelucia Villas 302 P.3d 617 Ariz. 2013
Ralph and Carolee Thomas v. Montelucia Villas 302 P.3d 617 Ariz. 2013
Co. of Am., (citing Kammert Bros. Enters., 4 P.2d 678 (1967); Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 277 (1981); 4 Corbin on Contracts § 977 (1951)).
Dessarollo Immobiliario Y Negocios Industriales De Alta Tecnologia De Hermosillo v. Kader Holdings Company Limited Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Dessarollo Immobiliario Y Negocios Industriales De Alta Tecnologia De Hermosillo v. Kader Holdings Company Limited Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Thomas v. MONTELUCIA VILLAS, LLC 275 P.3d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Thomas v. MONTELUCIA VILLAS, LLC 275 P.3d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Co., , (citing Kammert Bros. Enters., , 2 Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 277 (1981); 4 Corbin on Contracts § 977 (1951)).
ELM RETIREMENT CENTER, LP v. Callaway 246 P.3d 938 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
ELM RETIREMENT CENTER, LP v. Callaway 246 P.3d 938 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Wilshire Insurance v. S.A. 227 P.3d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Wilshire Insurance v. S.A. 227 P.3d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Co. of Am., , (specific typewritten provisions control over conflicting more general printed provisions).