Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Blech v. Blech, 430 P.2d 710.

26 citing documents.

Mayberry v. Stambaugh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Mayberry v. Stambaugh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
¶13 Subsequently, we applied the Hoffman approach— considering the child's best interests in deciding whether to accept an implied confession of error—in cases involving child custody or support, but we also expanded the 5 MAYBERRY v. STAMBAUGH Decision of the Court exception to general divorce matters, (citing Hoffman in a divorce appeal that did n
Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Smith v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
App. P. 15(c); but are not required to do so, ¶ 2
Gorman v. City of Phoenix 731 P.2d 74 Ariz. 1987
Gorman v. City of Phoenix 731 P.2d 74 Ariz. 1987
Marriage of Bugh v. Bugh 608 P.2d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Marriage of Bugh v. Bugh 608 P.2d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
454 , , Hoffman v. Hoffman, 4 Ariz.App.
Mead v. Nacey 531 P.2d 166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
Mead v. Nacey 531 P.2d 166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Dugger 497 P.2d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Dugger 497 P.2d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Ghyselinck v. Buchanan 474 P.2d 844 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Ghyselinck v. Buchanan 474 P.2d 844 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Arizona Corp. Commission v. Construction Trucking Service 473 P.2d 824 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Arizona Corp. Commission v. Construction Trucking Service 473 P.2d 824 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
454 , , ; Hoffman v. Hoffman, 4 Ariz.App.
Arizona Tank Lines, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 473 P.2d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Arizona Tank Lines, Inc. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 473 P.2d 821 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
454 , , , we will normally take a failure to file an answering brief as a confession of error unless there are circumstances indicating that we should not.
State ex rel. Flickinger v. Harris 464 P.2d 808 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State ex rel. Flickinger v. Harris 464 P.2d 808 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
83 , ; , ; Carter v. State ex rel.
O'Neil v. Aye 459 P.2d 340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Distinguished O'Neil v. Aye 459 P.2d 340 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
83 , , Counterman v. Counterman, 6 Ariz.App.
Campbell v. Malik 454 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Campbell v. Malik 454 P.2d 1002 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Since the “finality” issue is debatable, and we ■ , to warrant consideration of the merits of this appeal, we deem reversal appropriate.
National Exhibition Company v. Marx 453 P.2d 993 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
National Exhibition Company v. Marx 453 P.2d 993 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by