Cited by

Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc.

Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc., -86, -30 (App. 1983).

On appeal, Father contends Mother’s fee affidavit did not comply with Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc., because it included charges for several subpoenas that were quashed.6 5 Father cited several bank statements which he claimed proved Mother’s marital waste.

He found both parties had taken 1 See Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc., P.2d 927 (App. 1983).

¶25 A successful party in a contract action is entitled to recover fees for “‘every item of service which, at the time rendered, would have been undertaken by a reasonable and prudent lawyer to advance or protect his client’s interest.’” Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc., (quoting Twin City Sportservice v. Charles O. Finley & Co., 676 F.2d 1291, 1313 (9th Cir. 1982)).

6 See Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc.

1 See Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc.

5 FLYNN v. RODRICK Decision of the Court ¶8 “In order for the court to make a determination that the hours claimed are justified, the fee application must be in sufficient detail to enable the court to assess the reasonableness of the time incurred.” Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc.

Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass’n, –91, ¶¶ 37–38 (App. 2007) (application for fees must comply with requirements of Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc., before burden shifts to party opposing fees to show amount requested is unreasonable).

and the time spent in providing the service.” See Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc.

See Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc., TEMPE/CHAVEZ v. STATE/BRNOVICH Opinion of the Court ¶ 29 (App. 2012) (citing Corbin, 173 Ariz. at 594).

§ 14-11004(A) (establishing that a trustee is 1 Walton initially filed her motion on December 3, 2013, but she failed to include an application that complies with Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc., P.2d 927 (App. 1983).

See generally Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc., P.2d 927 (App. 1983).

Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc.

Co., ¶ 5 , (expert witness fees and costs); Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc., -88 , -32 (App.1983) (explaining how to determine reasonable attorneys’ fees based on billing rates, hours expended, success of claims); see also, e.g., A.R.S.

See Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc., , (“[A]n appellate court is somewhat unsuited for the fact-finding inquiry which is frequently necessary to properly determine reasonable fees for legal services rendered.”).

SHINGTON v. PELLERITO Decision of the Court ¶20 Section 12-1580(E) states that the trial court can only assess fees and costs against the judgment debtor if the court finds that the objection was “solely for the purpose of delay or to harass the judgment creditor.” The statute does not require a hearing and neither does Schweiger v. China Doll Restuarant, Inc., P.2d 927 (App. 1983).

and the time spent providing the service.” Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc.

Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc., –88, – 32 (App. 1983).

We also remand to allow the court to consider any objection Father has to Exhibit 7, as well as the reasonableness of Wife’s requested and awarded $8000 in 2 See Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc.

¶47 A party seeking an award of attorney fees has the burden of presenting an affidavit indicating “the type of legal services provided, the date the service was provided, the attorney providing the service (if more than one attorney was involved in the appeal), and the time spent in providing the service.” Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc.

¶ 47 A party seeking an award of attorney fees has the burden of presenting an affidavit indicating “the type of legal services provided, the date the service was provided, the attorney providing the service (if more than one attorney was involved in the appeal), and the time spent in providing the service.” Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc.

¶9 In reply, P.2d 927 (App. 1983).

Schweiger v. China Doll Rest., Inc.