Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Lacer v. Navajo County, 687 P.2d 400.

76 citing documents.

Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. AHCCCS 803 P.2d 925 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. AHCCCS 803 P.2d 925 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
§ 12-341.01(A) on the theory that the action is still one arising out of contract, , then logic compels us to conclude that proving the absence of a lien does not change the theory of a suit brought to enforce a lien.
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 803 P.2d 925 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System 803 P.2d 925 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
§ 12-341.01(A) on the theory that the action is still one arising out of contract, , then logic compels us to conclude that proving the absence of a lien does not change the theory of a suit brought to enforce a lien.
Chavarria v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 798 P.2d 1343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Chavarria v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 798 P.2d 1343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Thus, , the court declined to accept the county’s assertion that $70 per hour was a reasonable fee for its attorney’s services, and required it to supplement its application for attorney’s fees on appeal under section 12-341.01(A) with “evidence as to the actual hourly costs incurred by the county.”
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 781 P.2d 605 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 781 P.2d 605 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
In its answering brief, however, the Department of Revenue notes that under Rule 21(c), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, , this court may award attorney’s fees for work done in the trial court where the losing party in the trial court prevails on appeal, and therefore urges that we address the question of whether the Department of Revenue may be liable for an award of fees under A.R.S.
Colberg v. Rellinger 770 P.2d 346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Pettay v. Insurance Marketing Services, Inc. 752 P.2d 18 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Pettay v. Insurance Marketing Services, Inc. 752 P.2d 18 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp. 748 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Marcus v. Fox 747 P.2d 1223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Marcus v. Fox 747 P.2d 1223 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
§ 12-341.01(B) specifically provides that attorneys’ fees awarded under this provision *526 “may not exceed the amount paid or agreed to be paid.” , Division One of this court held that A.R.S.
Lange v. Lotzer 727 P.2d 38 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Lange v. Lotzer 727 P.2d 38 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
is subordinate to other statutes which may provide for attorney’s fees.” , .395
FLOOD CONTROL DIST. OF MARICOPA CTY. v. Conlin 712 P.2d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
FLOOD CONTROL DIST. OF MARICOPA CTY. v. Conlin 712 P.2d 979 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
cf., Amphitheater Unified School District No. 10 v. Harte, , (the term “state” *71 as used in A.R.S.
City of Phoenix v. Marathon Steel Co. 722 P.2d 341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
City of Phoenix v. Marathon Steel Co. 722 P.2d 341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
this court held that a governmental agency can recover its attorneys’ fees when it prevails in an action arising out of contract under A.R.S.
City of Phoenix v. Great Western Bank & Trust 712 P.2d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
City of Phoenix v. Great Western Bank & Trust 712 P.2d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Buckmaster v. Dent 707 P.2d 319 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Buckmaster v. Dent 707 P.2d 319 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Navajo County had proved no deed restrictions existed on the use of property Lacer’s father had conveyed which Lacer had sued to recover.
New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. State 696 P.2d 185 Ariz. 1985
New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. State 696 P.2d 185 Ariz. 1985