Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Schnyder v. Empire Metals, Inc., 666 P.2d 528.

26 citing documents.

Gipson v. Kasey 129 P.3d 957 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Gipson v. Kasey 129 P.3d 957 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Fed’n, , Schnyder v. Empire Metals, Inc., -31 , -31 (App.1983).
Barrett v. Harris 86 P.3d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Barrett v. Harris 86 P.3d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Rossell, 147 Ariz. at 169 , 709 P.2d at 526 ; , Schnyder v. Empire Metals, Inc., -31 , -31 (App.1983); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 281 cmt.
Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & Young 901 P.2d 1178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & Young 901 P.2d 1178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Schnyder v. Empire Metals, Inc.
Davis v. Cessna Aircraft Corp. 893 P.2d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Davis v. Cessna Aircraft Corp. 893 P.2d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Under a foreseeability analysis, " ‘we must take a broad view of the class of risks and victims that are foreseeable, and the particular manner in which the injury is brought about need not be foreseeable.’ ” Rogers, 170 Ariz. at 401 , 825 P.2d at 22 (quoting Schnyder v. Empire Metals, Inc., , (citations omitted)).
Rogers by and Through Standley v. Retrum 825 P.2d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Rogers by and Through Standley v. Retrum 825 P.2d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
First, “we must take a broad view of the class of risks and victims that are foreseeable, and the particular manner in which the injury is brought about need not be foreseeable.” Schnyder v. Empire Metals, Inc., , ( , ).
Alhambra School District v. Superior Court 796 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1990
Alhambra School District v. Superior Court 796 P.2d 470 Ariz. 1990
99, 100 (1928): “The risk reasonably to be perceived defines the duty to be obeyed.” See also Schnyder v. Empire Metals, Inc., , (“The scope of the risk created by one’s conduct defines the group of potential plaintiffs to whom a duty is owed”).
Udy v. Calvary Corp. 780 P.2d 1055 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Dolezal v. Carbrey 778 P.2d 1261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Dolezal v. Carbrey 778 P.2d 1261 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Schnyder v. Empire Metals, Inc., , accord, Griffith v. Valley of the Sun Recovery & Adjustment Bureau
Bach v. State 730 P.2d 854 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Bach v. State 730 P.2d 854 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
The foregoing authorities are consistent with the general rule that “[i]t is not necessary that the exact manner in which the accident occurred could not have been foreseen if the injured person is within the foreseeable range of the negligent conduct and the injury results from a recognizable risk.” Schnyder v. Empire Metals, Inc.
Rossell v. Volkswagen of America 709 P.2d 517 Ariz. 1985
Rossell v. Volkswagen of America 709 P.2d 517 Ariz. 1985
Schnyder v. Empire Metals, Inc.
WILLIAMS BY WILLIAMS v. Stewart 703 P.2d 546 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
WILLIAMS BY WILLIAMS v. Stewart 703 P.2d 546 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
See W. Prosser & W. Keeton, supra, § 43; , Schnyder v. Empire Metals, Inc.
Boswell v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 730 P.2d 178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Boswell v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 730 P.2d 178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Schnyder v. Empire Metals, Inc.
Dombey v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 708 P.2d 742 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Dombey v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 708 P.2d 742 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
See Schnyder v. Empire Metals, Inc., , (Court of Appeals must consider the evidence in a light most favorable to the prevailing party and must give that party all reasonable inferences arising therefrom).
Rossell v. Volkswagen of America 709 P.2d 533 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984