Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Estes Co. v. Aztec Const., Inc., 677 P.2d 939.

36 citing documents.

Baiker v. Kaplan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Baiker v. Kaplan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
When parties bind themselves with clear and unambiguous terms, the court “must give effect to the contract as written.” Estes Co. v. Aztec Constr., Inc.
Wassenaar v. Wassenaar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Wassenaar v. Wassenaar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
“A general principle of contract law is that where parties bind themselves by a lawful contract and the terms of the contract are clear and unambiguous, a court must give effect to the contract as written.” Estes Co. v. Aztec Constr., Inc.
Sakthiveilv. Capital Fund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sakthiveilv. Capital Fund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
B. Binding Loan Documents ¶15 “A general principle of contract law is that where parties bind themselves by a lawful contract and the terms of the contract are clear and unambiguous, a court must give effect to the contract as written.” Estes Co. v. Aztec Constr., Inc.
Monte v. Bertsch-Monte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Monte v. Bertsch-Monte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
See Estes Co. v. Aztec Constr., Inc.
Soverign v. Integrated Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Soverign v. Integrated Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. Partnership 279 P.3d 1191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. Partnership 279 P.3d 1191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Co., , Estes Co. v. Aztec Constr., Inc., -69 , -42 (App.1983); Allison Steel Mfg.
Evans Withycombe, Inc. v. Western Innovations, Inc. 159 P.3d 547 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Evans Withycombe, Inc. v. Western Innovations, Inc. 159 P.3d 547 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
See, also, Estes Co. v. Aztec Const., Inc., , (“The parties expressly contracted with respect to the duty to indemnify and the extent of that duty must be determined from the contract”).
Grubb & Ellis Management Services, Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C. 138 P.3d 1210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Grubb & Ellis Management Services, Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C. 138 P.3d 1210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Estes Co. v. Aztec Constr., Inc., , see also INA Ins.
Cunningham v. Goettl Air Conditioning, Inc. 980 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Cunningham v. Goettl Air Conditioning, Inc. 980 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Birth Hope Adoption Agency, Inc. v. Doe 947 P.2d 859 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Birth Hope Adoption Agency, Inc. v. Doe 947 P.2d 859 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Estes Co. v. Aztec Constr., Inc.
Washington Elementary School District No. 6 v. Baglino Corp. 817 P.2d 3 Ariz. 1991
Washington Elementary School District No. 6 v. Baglino Corp. 817 P.2d 3 Ariz. 1991
See, , Estes Co. v. Aztec Constr., Inc.
MECHANICAL AIR ENGINEER. v. Totem Const. 801 P.2d 426 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
MECHANICAL AIR ENGINEER. v. Totem Const. 801 P.2d 426 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Estes Co. v. Aztec Const., Inc., , , 941 (App. 1983).
Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc. v. Camelback Office Park 751 P.2d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc. v. Camelback Office Park 751 P.2d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Estes Company v. Aztec Construction, Inc.
Superior Companies v. Kaiser Cement Corp. 733 P.2d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Superior Companies v. Kaiser Cement Corp. 733 P.2d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Co., , Estes Co. v. Aztec Constr., Inc.
Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co. 733 P.2d 652 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co. 733 P.2d 652 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
In Estes Co. v. Aztec Constr., Inc., , the indemnity provision in a construction contract provided that the subcontractor would indemnify the general contractor “from any claims, liability or losses suffered by anyone wholly or partially through the negligence of [subcontractor.” Id.
Ina Insurance Co. of North America v. Valley Forge Insurance 722 P.2d 975 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Ina Insurance Co. of North America v. Valley Forge Insurance 722 P.2d 975 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
When there is an express indemnity contract, the extent of the duty to indemnify must be determined from the contract, , Estes Co. v. Aztec Construction, Inc., , and not by reliance on implied indemnity principles, Rossmoor Sanitation, Inc. v. Pylon, Inc., 13 Cal.3d 622 , 119 Cal.Rptr.
Skousen v. W.C. Olsen Investment Co. 717 P.2d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Skousen v. W.C. Olsen Investment Co. 717 P.2d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Estes Company v. Aztec Construction, Inc., , Shirley v. National Applicators of California, Inc., , Barnes v. Lopez, 25 Ariz.App.
Transamerica Insurance v. Trico International, Inc. 716 P.2d 1041 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Transamerica Insurance v. Trico International, Inc. 716 P.2d 1041 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Estes Co. v. Aztec Construction, Inc., 139 * , Sequoia Mfg.