Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite J.W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. v. Arizona State Registrar of Contractors, 690 P.2d 119.
- Gomez Pools v. Arizona Registrar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Gomez Pools v. Arizona Registrar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Revive v. Shea-Connelly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Revive v. Shea-Connelly
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Hancock Enters., (holding that an ROC finding that the contractor was 3 REVIVE v. SHEA-CONNELLY Decision of the Court required to install insulation precluded the contractor from bringing a declaratory judgment action on that qu
- State of Arizona v. Jason Eugene Bush 423 P.3d 370 Ariz. 2018
- Nick Hardy v. Nyberg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
Nick Hardy v. Nyberg
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Hancock Enters., -10, –29 (App. 1984) (noting that Arizona courts give preclusive effect to decisions made by administrative agencies in adjudicative capacities), Hardy also concedes that the ROC could not award compensatory damages to Nyberg.
- State ex rel. Polk v. Hancock 340 P.3d 380 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State ex rel. Polk v. Hancock
340 P.3d 380
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
v. Ariz. Registrar of Contractors, -05 , -24 (App.1984); see also State ex rel.
- State ex rel. Montgomery v. Mathis 290 P.3d 1226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
-
State ex rel. Montgomery v. Mathis
290 P.3d 1226
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
v. Ariz. Registrar of Contractors, -05 , -24 (App.1984); see also State ex rel.
- Cook v. State 281 P.3d 1053 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
-
Cook v. State
281 P.3d 1053
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Hancock Enters., Inc., v. Ariz. State Registrar of Contractors, , courts in Arizona “have repeated and refined a group of factors to be considered.” Donald, 198 Ariz. at 416, ¶ 37 , 10 P.3d at 1203 .
- Gelb v. Department of Fire, Building & Life Safety 241 P.3d 512 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- Gelb v. Department of Fire, Building & Life Safety 241 P.3d 512 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
- Seisinger v. Siebel 195 P.3d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
- Seisinger v. Siebel 195 P.3d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
- Coconino County v. Antco, Inc. 148 P.3d 1155 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
-
Coconino County v. Antco, Inc.
148 P.3d 1155
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Hancock Enter., , (potential violation of separation of powers where there is “significant interference by one department with the operations of another department”).
- State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Rayes 141 P.3d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
-
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Rayes
141 P.3d 806
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
(“[T]he separation of powers doctrine does not forbid all blending of powers, but only is intended to keep one branch of government from exercising the whole power of another branch.”); see also The Federalist Papers, No. 47 (“[W]here the whole power of one department is exercised b
- Ottaway v. Smith 113 P.3d 1247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
- Ottaway v. Smith 113 P.3d 1247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
- Bentivegna v. Powers Steel & Wire Products, Inc. 81 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
-
Bentivegna v. Powers Steel & Wire Products, Inc.
81 P.3d 1040
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Hancock Enter’s, , (finding that “[t]he Registrar’s power is limited to suspending or revoking a contractor’s license, or attaching conditions to the license.
- Facilitec, Inc. v. Hibbs 59 P.3d 803 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
- McDonald v. Thomas 40 P.3d 819 Ariz. 2002
-
McDonald v. Thomas
40 P.3d 819
Ariz. 2002
Hancock Enterprises, P.2d 119 (App. 1984).
- State v. Donald 10 P.3d 1193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
- State v. Donald 10 P.3d 1193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
- Citizens Clean Elections Commission v. Myers 1 P.3d 706 Ariz. 2000
- Martin v. Reinstein 987 P.2d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
- Martin v. Reinstein 987 P.2d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
- San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior Court 972 P.2d 179 Ariz. 1999
-
San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior Court
972 P.2d 179
Ariz. 1999
Hancock Enters., v. Arizona State Registrar of Contractors
- State Ex Rel. Woods v. Block 942 P.2d 428 Ariz. 1997
-
State Ex Rel. Woods v. Block
942 P.2d 428
Ariz. 1997
-06 , -25 (App.1984) (quoting Ariz. Const, art. III).
- Collins v. Miller & Miller, Ltd. 943 P.2d 747 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
-
Collins v. Miller & Miller, Ltd.
943 P.2d 747
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Hancock Enter, v. Arizona State Registrar of Contractors
- Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Superior Court 882 P.2d 1285 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
-
Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Superior Court
882 P.2d 1285
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Hancock Enter, v. Arizona State Registrar of Contractors
- Cactus Wren Partners v. Arizona Department of Building & Fire Safety 869 P.2d 1212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
- Cactus Wren Partners v. Arizona Department of Building & Fire Safety 869 P.2d 1212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
- Semple v. Tri-City Drywall, Inc. 838 P.2d 1369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
-
Semple v. Tri-City Drywall, Inc.
838 P.2d 1369
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Hancock Enterprises, , (“Hancock II”), involved a consolidated declaratory judgment action and statutory appeal for review of a decision by the Registrar of Contractors.
- State v. Ramsey 831 P.2d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
-
State v. Ramsey
831 P.2d 408
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
v. Arizona State Registrar of Contractors, , (excellent discussion on separation of powers).
- Southwest Gas Corp. v. Arizona Corp. Commission 818 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
-
Southwest Gas Corp. v. Arizona Corp. Commission
818 P.2d 714
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
v. Arizona State Registrar of Contractors
- Moreno v. Garcia 821 P.2d 247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991