Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State Ex Rel. Dandoy v. City of Phoenix, 651 P.2d 862.

27 citing documents.

Letona v. Adoc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Letona v. Adoc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
abrogated on other grounds by Legacy Found.
Legacy Foundation Action v. Citizens Clean Election Ariz. 2018
Legacy Foundation Action v. Citizens Clean Election Ariz. 2018
the party challenging an injunction based on an 5 LEGACY V. CITIZENS CLEAN ELECTIONS COMMISSION Opinion of the Court administrative consent order had failed to timely appeal that order.
Legacy v. Citizens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Legacy v. Citizens Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Rozenman v. Rozenman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Rozenman v. Rozenman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(“An erroneous interpretation and application of a statutory provision, however, will normally constitute mere legal error and not operate to 3 ROZENMAN v. ROZENMAN Decision of the Court his bu
Miller v. Arizona Corp. Commission 251 P.3d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Miller v. Arizona Corp. Commission 251 P.3d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
(distinguishing between legal error that is not subject to collateral attack and a challenge to jurisdiction).
VICARI v. Lake Havasu City 213 P.3d 367 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
VICARI v. Lake Havasu City 213 P.3d 367 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
-39 , -67 (App.1982) (noting that in cases involving direct appeal, lack of jurisdiction is often confused with legal error).
Guminski v. THE ARIZONA STATE VETERINARY MEDICAL EXAMINING BOARD 33 P.3d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Guminski v. THE ARIZONA STATE VETERINARY MEDICAL EXAMINING BOARD 33 P.3d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
“the failure to seek review of an administrative agency decision within the time and in the manner provided by [statute] results in the decision becoming final and not subject to judicial review for mere legal error or factual insufficiency.” ¶ 9 A trial court’s decision to dismiss
Southwestern Paint & Varnish Co. v. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 976 P.2d 872 Ariz. 1999
Guertin v. Pinal County 875 P.2d 843 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Guertin v. Pinal County 875 P.2d 843 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
(failure to seek review of administrative agency decision as provided in Administrative Review Act results in final decision no longer subject to judicial review).
Thielking v. Kirschner 859 P.2d 777 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Thielking v. Kirschner 859 P.2d 777 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Collins v. State 803 P.2d 130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Collins v. State 803 P.2d 130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Gilbert v. Board of Medical Examiners 745 P.2d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Gilbert v. Board of Medical Examiners 745 P.2d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Oliver v. Arizona Department of Racing 708 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Oliver v. Arizona Department of Racing 708 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Where jurisdiction lies to try an issue, the resulting decision “cannot be collaterally attacked for error of law, whether that error be one of misconstruction of a statute or other legal error.” , ( , ).
Anderson v. State 663 P.2d 570 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Anderson v. State 663 P.2d 570 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982