Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Kuhnke v. Textron, Inc., 684 P.2d 159.

25 citing documents.

State v. Watkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
¶ 18 (2019) (citing Kuhnke v. Textron, Inc., ).
State v. Rady Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Rady Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
.”); see also Estate of Reinen v. N. Ariz. Orthopedics, Ltd., ¶ 12 (2000) (“The credibility of a witness’ testimony and the weight it should be given are issues particularly within the province of the jury.”) (quoting Kuhnke v. Textron, Inc., ).
White v. 1st Choice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
White v. 1st Choice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Kuhnke v. Textron, Inc., (“The credibility of a witness’ testimony and the weight it should be given are issues particularly within the province of the jury.”).
Quintana-Suarez v. Cazares Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Quintana-Suarez v. Cazares Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
In reviewing the record on appeal, we defer to the jury’s assessments of witness credibility, and do not reweigh conflicting evidence, see Kuhnke v. Textron, Inc., and will not substitute our evaluation of the facts, Ballesteros-Suarez, 222 Ariz. at 52, ¶ 11.
Valdez v. Delgado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Valdez v. Delgado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Estate of Reinen v. Northern Arizona Orthopedics, Ltd., ¶ 12 (2000) (quoting Kuhnke v. Textron, Inc., ).
State v. Arvizu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Arvizu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
And because “[t]he credibility of a witness’ testimony and the weight it should be given are issues particularly within the province of the jury,” see Kuhnke v. Textron, Inc., the jurors were entitled to either reject or accept the officers’ testimony and we will not re-weigh the evidence on appeal
Belliard v. Becker 166 P.3d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Belliard v. Becker 166 P.3d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
“The credibility of a witness’ testimony and the weight it should be given are issues particularly within the province of the jury.” Estate of Reinen v. N. Ariz. Orthopedics, Ltd., ¶ 12 , (quoting Kuhnke v. Textron, Inc., , ) (internal quotation marks omitted); , (holding this court will not reweigh conflicting evidence presented to a jury when determining whether there was sufficient evidence to support a
Estate of Reinen v. Northern Arizona Orthopedics, Ltd. 9 P.3d 314 Ariz. 2000
Estate of Reinen v. Northern Arizona Orthopedics, Ltd. 9 P.3d 314 Ariz. 2000
“The credibility of a witness’ testimony and the weight it should be given are issues particularly within the province of the jury.” Kuhnke v. Textron, Inc.
Maricopa Partnerships, Inc. v. Petyak 790 P.2d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Maricopa Partnerships, Inc. v. Petyak 790 P.2d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Rodriguez v. Schlittenhart 780 P.2d 442 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Rodriguez v. Schlittenhart 780 P.2d 442 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Levitt v. First American Title Insurance 767 P.2d 707 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Levitt v. First American Title Insurance 767 P.2d 707 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Deadman v. Valley Nat. Bank of Arizona 743 P.2d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Deadman v. Valley Nat. Bank of Arizona 743 P.2d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
McGuire v. Caterpillar Tractor Co. 728 P.2d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
McGuire v. Caterpillar Tractor Co. 728 P.2d 290 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986