Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Knoell Bros. Const. v. State, Dept. of Rev., 644 P.2d 905.

32 citing documents.

Porter v. Triad of Arizona (L.P.) 52 P.3d 799 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Porter v. Triad of Arizona (L.P.) 52 P.3d 799 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
See Knoell Brothers Construction
T.W.M. Custom Framing v. Industrial Commission 6 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
T.W.M. Custom Framing v. Industrial Commission 6 P.3d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
See Knoell Bros. Constr., Inc. v. Arizona Dep’t of Revenue, , abrogated on other grounds by Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Dep’t of Revenue, , (“where the same words or phrases appear in the same statute, they will be given a generally accepted and consistent meaning unless the legislative intent is clearly
Jennings v. Woods 982 P.2d 274 Ariz. 1999
Jennings v. Woods 982 P.2d 274 Ariz. 1999
See Knoell Bros. Constr., , , (“In statutory construction, it is a general rule that where the same words or phrases appear in the same statute, they will be given a generally accepted and consistent
Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 959 P.2d 1256 Ariz. 1998
Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 959 P.2d 1256 Ariz. 1998
PCS, Inc. v. Arizona Dep’t of Revenue, , , Knoell Bros. Const.
State Ex Rel. Department of Revenue v. Driggs 938 P.2d 469 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State Ex Rel. Department of Revenue v. Driggs 938 P.2d 469 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
See, e.g., Duhame v. State Tax Comm’n, , Knoell Brothers Constr., Inc. v. Arizona Dep’t of Revenue
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Lindsey 885 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Lindsey 885 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
v. State Dep’t of Revenue
Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 851 P.2d 132 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Tucson Electric Power Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 851 P.2d 132 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Ass'n, , Duhame v. State Tax Comm’n, , , , Knoell Brothers Construction
Flexmaster Aluminum Awning Co., Inc. v. Hirschberg 839 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Flexmaster Aluminum Awning Co., Inc. v. Hirschberg 839 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Wheeler v. Yuma School District No. One 750 P.2d 860 Ariz. 1988
Wheeler v. Yuma School District No. One 750 P.2d 860 Ariz. 1988
Citing Knoell Brothers Construction, Inc. v. State, Department of Revenue, , it argues that the court must avoid a statutory interpretation that leads to an absurdity.
Transamerica Financial Corp. v. Superior Court 746 P.2d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Transamerica Financial Corp. v. Superior Court 746 P.2d 497 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
See Knoell Brothers Construction
Gosnell Development Corp. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 744 P.2d 451 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Gosnell Development Corp. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 744 P.2d 451 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Kitchell Contractors, Inc. v. City of Phoenix 726 P.2d 236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Kitchell Contractors, Inc. v. City of Phoenix 726 P.2d 236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
This same conclusion was reached by our court in Knoell Brothers Construction, , under state law.
State v. Oehlerking 709 P.2d 900 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Oehlerking 709 P.2d 900 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
See Knoell Brothers Construction
City of Phoenix v. SUPER. COURT, MARICOPA CTY. 696 P.2d 724 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
City of Phoenix v. SUPER. COURT, MARICOPA CTY. 696 P.2d 724 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Kerr 690 P.2d 145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Kerr 690 P.2d 145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Knoell Brothers Construction
State ex rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Chastain Builders, Inc. 669 P.2d 1017 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State ex rel. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Chastain Builders, Inc. 669 P.2d 1017 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Finally, our conclusion is supported by our opinion in Knoell Brothers Construction, Inc. v. State, Department of Revenue