Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Huskie v. Ames Bros. Motor & Supply Co., 678 P.2d 977.

57 citing documents.

Focal Point, Inc. v. U-Haul Co. of Arizona, Inc. 746 P.2d 488 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
See Huskie v. Ames Bros. Motor & Supply Co., , 2 Historically, tort law has drawn a distinction between mere interference with the chattel, and the “exercise of defend *320 ant’s hostile control over it.” Restatement (Second) of Torts § 222(A), Comment a, (1965), citing Fouldes v. Willoughby, 8 M. & W. 540, 151 Eng.Rep.
Triangle Construction v. City of Phoenix 720 P.2d 87 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Triangle Construction v. City of Phoenix 720 P.2d 87 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Harte v. Stuttgart Autohaus, Inc. 706 P.2d 394 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Harte v. Stuttgart Autohaus, Inc. 706 P.2d 394 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Matter of Estate of Musgrove 696 P.2d 720 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Matter of Estate of Musgrove 696 P.2d 720 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Guirey, Srnka & Arnold