Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Pacific Indemnity Company v. Kohlhase, 455 P.2d 277.
-
Industrial Park Center v. Great Northern Insurance
Ariz. 2026
n.1 (1969) (“Under ‘all risks’ coverage, recovery is allowed for all fortuitous losses not resulting from misconduct or fraud of the insured unless the policy contains a specific provision expressly excluding the particular loss from coverage.”).
- Kirkland v. Old United Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Kirkland v. Old United
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(insurer “may lawfully exclude certain risks from the coverage of its policy”).
- Associated Aviation Underwriters v. Wood 98 P.3d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
-
Associated Aviation Underwriters v. Wood
98 P.3d 572
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
(“When recovery is sought under an insurance contract, the insured has the burden of proving that his loss was due to an insured risk.”).
- Keggi v. Northbrook Property & Casualty Insurance 13 P.3d 785 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
- Keggi v. Northbrook Property & Casualty Insurance 13 P.3d 785 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
- Republic Insurance v. Feidler 969 P.2d 173 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
-
Republic Insurance v. Feidler
969 P.2d 173
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
see also Hartford Accident & Indem.
- Security Insurance Co. of Hartford v. Andersen 763 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1988
-
Security Insurance Co. of Hartford v. Andersen
763 P.2d 246
Ariz. 1988
*430 (iquoted in Omaha Sky Divers Parachute Club, Inc. v. Ranger Ins.
- Scottsdale Insurance v. Monares 734 P.2d 106 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
-
Scottsdale Insurance v. Monares
734 P.2d 106
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Scottsdale supports its claim that the validity of the policy’s
- Security Insurance Co. of Hartford v. Andersen 763 P.2d 251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
-
Security Insurance Co. of Hartford v. Andersen
763 P.2d 251
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
cited and discussed by the parties, actually considered this issue.
- Linthicum v. Nationwide Life Insurance 723 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Linthicum v. Nationwide Life Insurance 723 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Almadova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 649 P.2d 284 Ariz. 1982
-
Almadova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
649 P.2d 284
Ariz. 1982
(citations omitted) 2 But see, e.g., Boggs v. Motors Insurance Corp., 139 A.2d 733 (D.C.
- Estrada v. Planet Insurance Company 546 P.2d 372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- Estrada v. Planet Insurance Company 546 P.2d 372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- Ranger Insurance Company v. Phillips 544 P.2d 250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- Ranger Insurance Company v. Phillips 544 P.2d 250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Company v. Smith 519 P.2d 860 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
- Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Company v. Smith 519 P.2d 860 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Villasenor 517 P.2d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Villasenor 517 P.2d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
- Vanguard Insurance Company v. Cantrell 503 P.2d 962 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
- Vanguard Insurance Company v. Cantrell 503 P.2d 962 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
- Chapman v. Ranger Insurance Company 485 P.2d 1168 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
- Chapman v. Ranger Insurance Company 485 P.2d 1168 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
- United American Life Insurance Company v. Beadel 475 P.2d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
-
United American Life Insurance Company v. Beadel
475 P.2d 288
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
Lastly, plaintiff contends the trial court erred in holding the burden of proof was on the insurer
- Dykeman v. Mission Insurance Company 471 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970
- Dykeman v. Mission Insurance Company 471 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1970