Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co., 694 P.2d 815.

54 citing documents.

Shoni v. Hansen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shoni v. Hansen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Co., disapproved on other grounds by Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Ins.
Atreus Communities Group v. Stardust Development, Inc. 277 P.3d 208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Atreus Communities Group v. Stardust Development, Inc. 277 P.3d 208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Co., , (Haire, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (“[E]xistenee of substantial evidentiary conflicts precludes the availability of the summary judgment remedy.”), disapproved on other grounds by Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Ins.
Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 898 P.2d 964 Ariz. 1995
Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 898 P.2d 964 Ariz. 1995
Anderson v. Country Life Insurance 886 P.2d 1381 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Terry v. Gaslight Square Associates 897 P.2d 667 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Terry v. Gaslight Square Associates 897 P.2d 667 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town and Country Shopping Center Co., Ltd.
Anderson v. Country Life Insurance 886 P.2d 1381 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Delbridge v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGR. IMP. 893 P.2d 46 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Delbridge v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGR. IMP. 893 P.2d 46 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
It denied the motion, citing Rule 59, Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, and Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co., Ltd.
HSL Linda Gardens Properties, Ltd. v. Freeman 859 P.2d 1339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
HSL Linda Gardens Properties, Ltd. v. Freeman 859 P.2d 1339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
It held however, relying on Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co., , that the covenants were breached at the time of the conveyance and that, therefore, HSL’s claims were barred by the statute of limitations.
Klimkowski v. De La Torre 857 P.2d 392 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Klimkowski v. De La Torre 857 P.2d 392 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
See Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co., Ltd.
Landi v. Arkules 835 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Landi v. Arkules 835 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
56; Woerth, v. City of Flagstaff, , Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co., Ltd.
Employer's Mutual Casualty Co. v. McKeon 821 P.2d 766 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Employer's Mutual Casualty Co. v. McKeon 821 P.2d 766 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Cecil Lawter Real E. v. Town & Country Shop.
Ancell v. Union Station Associates, Inc. 803 P.2d 450 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Ancell v. Union Station Associates, Inc. 803 P.2d 450 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
of Treasury Dept., , 221 n. 1A, , 968 n. 1A (App.1987); Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town and Country Shopping Center Co., Ltd.
Woerth v. City of Flagstaff 808 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Woerth v. City of Flagstaff 808 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Cecil Lawter Real Estate School v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co.
United Bank of Arizona v. Allyn 805 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
United Bank of Arizona v. Allyn 805 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Dary Co., , and Cecil Lawter Real Estate School v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co., , (reasonable inference test) with Grain Dealers Mut.
Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc. 798 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Sprang v. Petersen Lumber, Inc. 798 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & County Shopping Center Co.
Phoenix Orthopaedic Surgeons, Ltd. v. Peairs 790 P.2d 752 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Phoenix Orthopaedic Surgeons, Ltd. v. Peairs 790 P.2d 752 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
“An agreement is ambiguous if the language used by the parties can reasonably be construed in more than one sense, and such construction cannot be determined within the four corners of the instrument.” Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co., Ltd.
Walker v. City of Scottsdale 786 P.2d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Walker v. City of Scottsdale 786 P.2d 1057 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Gary Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Sun Lodge, Inc., , Cecil Lawter Real Estate School
Arizona Bd. of Regents for and on Behalf of University of Arizona v. State Ex Rel. State, Public … 771 P.2d 880 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Arizona Bd. of Regents for and on Behalf of University of Arizona v. State Ex Rel. State, Public … 771 P.2d 880 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
J.D. Land Co. v. Killian 762 P.2d 124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
J.D. Land Co. v. Killian 762 P.2d 124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
McCutchin v. SCA Services of Arizona, Inc., , Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co., Ltd.
Kelley v. Arizona Board of Pardons & Paroles 762 P.2d 121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Kelley v. Arizona Board of Pardons & Paroles 762 P.2d 121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
101 , 83 L.Ed.2d 46 (1985); Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co., Ltd.
Alpha Tax Services, Inc. v. Stuart 761 P.2d 1073 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Alpha Tax Services, Inc. v. Stuart 761 P.2d 1073 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co., Ltd.
Maricopa County Health Department v. Harmon 750 P.2d 1364 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Maricopa County Health Department v. Harmon 750 P.2d 1364 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Rule 59, Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, does not provide for the granting of a new trial based upon a newly devised defense, Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co., , and a trial court may not consider any alleged error as grounds for granting a new trial where no objection thereto was made on the record.
Continental Bank v. Guaranty Warehouse Corp. 738 P.2d 1129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Continental Bank v. Guaranty Warehouse Corp. 738 P.2d 1129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
“The interpretation of an instrument is a question of law to be determined by this court independently of the trial court’s determination.” Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co.
Realty Associates v. Valley National Bank 738 P.2d 1121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Realty Associates v. Valley National Bank 738 P.2d 1121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co., Ltd.
Molever v. Roush 732 P.2d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Molever v. Roush 732 P.2d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Portonova, 128 Ariz. at 502 , 627 P.2d at 233 ; Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co. Ltd.
State ex rel. Childers v. 2525 East Arizona Biltmore Circle Corp. 731 P.2d 1239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State ex rel. Childers v. 2525 East Arizona Biltmore Circle Corp. 731 P.2d 1239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
See Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by