Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite City of Phoenix v. Whiting, 457 P.2d 729.

30 citing documents.

Ahmad v. State 432 P.3d 932 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Ahmad v. State 432 P.3d 932 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Wrongful death is a statutory cause of action, ¶¶ 7–8 (2012), and the statutory scheme provides “a very broad base for the measure of damages,”
Clark v. New Magma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Clark v. New Magma Irrigation & Drainage District 92 P.3d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Clark v. New Magma Irrigation & Drainage District 92 P.3d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Clark’s argument on appeal on the claim consists of a single paragraph in his opening brief, in which he asserts that the District “maintained and controlled [its] easement” , which, he says, recognized that a city “may” be held liable for creating a public nuisance.
Clark v. New Magma Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Clark’s argument on appeal on the claim consists of a single paragraph in his opening brief, in which he asserts that the District “maintained and controlled [its] easement” which, he says, recognized that a city “may” be held liable for creating a public nuisance.
Torres v. North American Van Lines, Inc. 658 P.2d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Torres v. North American Van Lines, Inc. 658 P.2d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Taylor v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 637 P.2d 726 Ariz. 1981
Taylor v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 637 P.2d 726 Ariz. 1981
State v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 599 P.2d 777 Ariz. 1979
State v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 599 P.2d 777 Ariz. 1979
102 , and to remove dangerous dead trees from its land, , also extend to the individual.
Hall v. Olague 579 P.2d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Hall v. Olague 579 P.2d 577 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
540 , , wherein the courts stated that in a wrongful death action by the surviving spouse evidence of remarriage is not admissible, are in reality an application of the collateral source rule.
Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Corbin-Dykes Electric Co. 559 P.2d 1067 Ariz. 1976
Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Corbin-Dykes Electric Co. 559 P.2d 1067 Ariz. 1976
536 , , Thornton v. Marsico, 5 Ariz.App.
Ivicevic v. City of Glendale 549 P.2d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Ivicevic v. City of Glendale 549 P.2d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
(negligent repair of malfunctioning traffic signal); , (failure to provide water for firefighting purposes); , (negligent maintenance of rotting trees on city land adjoining street); Ve-godsky v. City of Tucson, 1 Ariz.App.
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. City of Scottsdale 537 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. City of Scottsdale 537 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Pinal County v. Adams, 13 Ariz.App.
State v. Cress 528 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Cress 528 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
City of Phoenix v. Kenly 519 P.2d 1159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
City of Phoenix v. Kenly 519 P.2d 1159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Carver v. Salt River Valley Water Users’ Ass’n
Chrysler Corporation v. McCarthy 484 P.2d 1065 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Chrysler Corporation v. McCarthy 484 P.2d 1065 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Pinal County v. Adams 479 P.2d 718 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Pinal County v. Adams 479 P.2d 718 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Peterson v. Feldman, 7 Ariz.App.
Hing v. Youtsey 460 P.2d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Hing v. Youtsey 460 P.2d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
In 87 A.L.R.2d 252 , p. 255 it is stated: “The majority of American jurisdictions, which have considered the question hold the remarriage of a surviving spouse, or the possibility thereof, does not affect the-damages recoverable for wrongful death of the deceased spouse.” , where the-trial judge was affirmed in precluding reference to the remarriage of a plaintiff.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by