Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Lake Havasu City v. Mohave County, 675 P.2d 1371.
- Rotter v. Coconino County 818 P.2d 704 Ariz. 1991
-
Rotter v. Coconino County
818 P.2d 704
Ariz. 1991
As the court of appeals noted in another case in which a statute’s language was amended from “shall” to “may” without specific expression of legislative intent, “when the legislature amends a statute we must presume they intended to change existing law rather than perform a futile act.”
- Williams v. Williams 801 P.2d 495 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
-
Williams v. Williams
801 P.2d 495
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
-76 , -28 (App.1985) (when interpreting statutes, courts will apply sensible construction); , (courts will apply statute in manner to avoid absurd results).
- State v. Irving 797 P.2d 1237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Irving 797 P.2d 1237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Flores 772 P.2d 589 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- State v. Flores 772 P.2d 589 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- Epstein v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 741 P.2d 322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- Distinguished Epstein v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 741 P.2d 322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- Aikins v. ARIZ. DEPT. OF WATER RESOURCES 743 P.2d 946 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- Aikins v. ARIZ. DEPT. OF WATER RESOURCES 743 P.2d 946 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- John Doe I v. SUPERIOR CT. IN & FOR PIMA CTY. 717 P.2d 473 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- John Doe I v. SUPERIOR CT. IN & FOR PIMA CTY. 717 P.2d 473 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- Wilson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 709 P.2d 895 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Wilson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 709 P.2d 895 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Matter of Appeal in Maricopa County 701 P.2d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Matter of Appeal in Maricopa County 701 P.2d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985